After seven fabulous years with you all, we are sorry to let you know that we're going to be retiring the Flixster Community site on September 30, 2014. Please note that you can still access your ratings, reviews, and quizzes on Flixster and Rotten Tomatoes using your same login. We have had so much fun building this community with you.
I wanted "Non-stop" to be terrible so that I could say "There is nothing more exciting than watching Liam Neeson text a bad guy for an hour and a half," but it ended up being really interesting. The writers did a great job of keeping us guessing until the very end, and I might even watch this film again to figure out how the bad guy did it. "Non-stop" does everything right as far as script, acting, twists, and action, but something makes it feel like "just another airplane emergency film." The story is unique and well executed but the progression of events is very routine and predictable. Everything's normal, someone realizes something is wrong, they get a few people involved in solving it, everyone begins to think that they are crazy, it turns out that they are right, panic ensues, time for the hero to save the day. I couldn't help but roll my eyes at the "my life is a mess but I am here to save you" speech - it was inevitable from the start. It seemed like they were going a little too far with the stereotypical frightened girl, although it becomes justified once we learn the truth about Neeson. I just wish that every other movie didn't use the same idea. The thing that sets this film apart from "Red Eye" and "Flightplan" is its use of social media to add a new, complex layer to the story. Liam Neeson is his kick-butt self, perfectly falling into that stereotyped persona that we love. Julianne Moore was underutilized but had a nice emotional moment, and I was particularly taken with Michelle Dockery as the flight attendant. "Non-stop" won't rock your world, but it's definitely an entertaining variation on the airplane emergency film that we all love to watch.
"High Society" is an enjoyable film but it will always live in the shadow of "The Philadelphia Story." This musical remake of the Cary Grant/Katharine Hepburn/Jimmy Stewart classic never had a chance of surpassing its predecessor, even with a catchy Cole Porter score and three superstars of its own. It is often remembered as Grace Kelly's final film. This must have been a dream for her after playing the role of Tracy on stage in a production of "The Philadelphia Story." She performs with elegance and warmth but lacks the attitude of Katharine Hepburn that is now associated with the character. The same goes for Frank Sinatra, whose singing is great and acting is enjoyable but he just couldn't match the Oscar-winning performance of Stewart. Bing Crosby suffers the same fate, not only because his performance falls short of Cary Grant, but also because he is an awkward 27 years older than Grace Kelly. While we're at it, I did not care for Celeste Holm as Liz Imbrie, particularly after seeing Ruth Hussey's Oscar-nominated performance in the same role. It is hard not to draw comparisons because "The Philadelphia Story" is simply so much better. My favorite part of the film is the featuring of Louis Armstrong. Similar to Duke Ellington in "Anatomy of a Murder," I feel like this preserves Satchmo on film forever with his unique singing style and amazing personality. From a singing perspective, the movie is great. With three leads that are this talented, each song is better than the last. From a script perspective, I understand that some things had to be changed to create an excuse for the musicians to be there, but I think that it weakened the story. And those slow moments that keep "The Philadelphia Story" from being perfection? They're still there. "High Society" is a good film that should be seen by all musical junkies but, if given a chance between these two films, you know which one I'd recommend.