Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Robert De Niro, Sean Penn, Demi Moore, Wallace Shawn, Hoyt Axton ... see more see more... , Bruno Kirby , Ray McAnally , James Russo , John C. Reilly , Jay Brazeau , Ken Buhay , Elizabeth Lawrence , Jessica Jickels , Karen Austin , Gerry Bean , Lloyd Berry , James Kidnie , Sheelah Megill , Richard Newman , Garwin Sanford , Frank Totino , Matthew Walker , Frank C. Turner , Jack Ackroyd , Antony Holland , Bill Murdoch

In this comedy, escaped prisoners Ned (Robert DeNiro) and Jim (Sean Penn) take refuge in a monastery where they pose as priests to avoid capture. Intending to flee across the Canadian border, the two ... read more read more...convicts run into all kinds of unexpected trouble in their new-found priesthood. ~ Iotis Erlewine, Rovi

Flixster Users

42% liked it

8,253 ratings

Critics

50% liked it

18 critics

PG-13, 2 hr.

Directed by: Neil Jordan

Release Date: December 15, 1989

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: February 17, 2004

Get It:

Stats: 237 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (237)


  • April 3, 2011
    Expecting an out-and-out comedy(considering its plot), I was disappointed slightly, but still it was a fun watch with that feel good factor.
  • September 19, 2010
    "Father, Father I've been shot!
    - I'm very happy for you."

    When the director is Neil Jordan, the screenwriter David Mamet and the cast includes Robert De Niro and Sean Penn, you'd think that 'We're No Angels' should be something quite good. I recently saw this and I'm stunned. B... read moreut not in a positive way.

    Jim (Penn) and Ned (De Niro) are two convicts that escape with a murderer called Bobby (James Russo). They arrive to a town near the Canadian border, where they are mistaken for two priests that have been waited for at the local monastery. They continue to pose as priests while looking for a chance to sneak to Canada. Things just get a bit harder when Bobby, who's wounded, is captured by the police and recognizes Ned.

    There's a lot of potential in 'We're No Angels' but things seem to go pretty wrong here. First of all, the acting is below any standards of mediocrity. Even my favourite actor from the 70's and 80's, Mr De Niro, seems annoying in every possible way. Sean Penn looks completely lost throughout the whole movie. Bruno Kirby reminded me once again why I dislike him. There is one (actually two) good performer in the movie and that is Demi Moore's breasts...

    The story is totally pointless, there's like zero excitement and the character development is slim. Jim's character left me a bit confused. John C. Reilly acts as one of the monks and I'm not sure what they're relationship is. There are some homoerotic undertones between them but this monk is also a big fan of the priest, Father Brown, that Ned presents himself as. Father Brown, who is one of two priests that should have arrived to the monestery, has written a book and Reilly's character is a big fan of him. He has a copy of the book with his picture on the back cover. His picture! You'd think that he, or any of that matter, should recognize an imposter? I don't know what Jim wanted at the end. Did he find his true calling as a person of faith or did he just want to look at the monk's "sinful place"?

    The acting is terrible, the story is weak with lots of holes in the plot and.. Well, what else do you need to say that a film is not just worth it? As a crime movie it doesn't work and as a comedy it falls flat. Skip it.
  • September 24, 2009
    I have a real soft spot for this fun film! I really like Neil Jordan films, this isn?t his best but I think the slamming it got from the critics was a little unfair!
  • August 27, 2007
    Sean Penn and Robert De Niro are a bunch of smelly escaped criminals from a cruel prison environment. They take refuge at a church and pull the wool over townspeoples' eyes while evading justice. They prove their worth by saving some lives. Not too funny or enjoyable.
  • May 15, 2007
    Robert DeNiro made a few shocking career choices in the 80s, and this is one of them. Witless and annoying mugging with zero laughs, despite the quality cast and director. And I have two words for you; "Demi" and "Moore".
  • December 9, 2010
    The story was interesting enough, but the acting was just over the top and ridiculous. The entire cast annoyed me, and I typically love De Niro and Penn.
  • December 30, 2009
    All that remained of the movie from 1955 is that the characters have escaped from prison. But I don't understand why everyone is expecting to get a sequel.

    This movie certainly is not recommended to those who are willing to see the story from 1955 retold, and it is also NOT rec... read moreommended to all those who think that a comedy is something that makes you laugh continuously or are allergic to simple questions or religious matters.
    But it is STRONGLY recommended to those who appreciate good acting and are not afraid to feel and think a little.
  • August 3, 2009
    This wasn't exactly a frame by frame remake,the location has adamantly changed,the protagonists however (minus one) and the confusing events have remained,with 50% changes as to the....main theme: priesthood!!!
    A larger number of characters (plus extra subplots) which apparently ... read morework up until the last 10 minutes where Mamet and Jordan fail to push it to the limits,rather creating the most conservative diversion.Woe to the uneducated audience.
  • December 15, 2007
    Hilarious!
  • April 27, 2008
    A surprisingly good movie, there are some repeated jokes and I don't like where the movie takes place.

Critic Reviews


Jamie Gillies
August 23, 2004
Jamie Gillies, Apollo Guide

This, one of the most disappointing films of the 1980s, was a dud upon its release and has not held up well at all. Full Review

Ken Hanke
September 11, 2003
Ken Hanke, Mountain Xpress (Asheville, NC)

One of Jordan's rare misfires.

Fred Topel
August 11, 2003
Fred Topel, About.com

Boring fish out of water story. No laugh out loud moments.

Phil Villarreal
December 24, 2002
Phil Villarreal, Arizona Daily Star

Falls short of its potential, but a fun lark nonetheless.

March 26, 2009
Variety

Click to read the article Full Review

Vincent Canby
May 20, 2003
Vincent Canby, New York Times

Click to read the article Full Review

Hal Hinson
January 1, 2000
Hal Hinson, Washington Post

Click to read the article Full Review

Roger Ebert
January 1, 2000
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

Click to read the article Full Review

Cole Smithey
September 26, 2005
Cole Smithey, ColeSmithey.com

No review available.

Emanuel Levy
July 6, 2005
Emanuel Levy, EmanuelLevy.Com

No review available.

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • The Pope Must Die (The Pope Must Diet)
    The Pope Must Die (The Pope Must Diet) (100%)
  • Nuns on the Run
    Nuns on the Run (100%)
  • The Presidio
    The Presidio (40%)
  • Fear
    Fear (40%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

We're No Angels : Watch Free on TV


We're No Angels Trivia


  • SAME NAME: Jason Biggs in American Pie James Dean in Rebel Without A Cause Leonardo DiCaprio in The Basketball Diaries Sean Penn in We're No Angels John C. Reilly in Magnolia  Answer »
  • What movie comically had Robert De Nero and Sean Penn dressing up & pretending to be monks while actually being convicts on the run!  Answer »
  • Who starred with Robert De Niro in "We're No Angels"?  Answer »
  • Which actor/actress starred in these films: We're No Angels, Topkapi & Billy Budd?   Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for We're No Angels. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?