Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

John Lithgow, Christopher Collet, Cynthia Nixon, Jill Eikenberry, John Mahoney ... see more see more... , Sully Boyar , Paul Austin , Dan Butler , Timothy Carhart , Al Cerullo , Ken Chapin , Richard Council , JD Cullum , Curt Dempster , Heather Rose Dominic , John Doumanian , Gregg Edelman , Charlie Fields , Katherine Hiler , Manny Jacobs , Bruce Jarchow , Richard Jenkins , Warren Keith , Robert Sean Leonard , Stephen Markle , Peter McRobbie , Fred Melamed , Edward D. Murphy , Geoffrey Nauffts , Harlan Cary Poe , David Quinn , Robert Schenkkan , Ned Schmidtke , Bruce Smolanoff , Adrian Sparks , Tom Tarpey , Abe Unger , Jimmie Ray Weeks , Steve Zettler , Frank Ferrara , Bran Ferren , Joan Harris , Trevor Bolling , Steve Borton , Sarah Burke , Richard Cardona , Allen De Cheser , Kerry Donovan , Eric Hsiao , Joan Kendall , Warren Manzi , Alec Massey , Dee Ann McDavid , Fred G. Smith , Michael Telesco , Tery Cummins , Richard Caselnova

Everyone knows that teenagers are smarter than adults, and if given a chance the kids could save the world -- if they don't blow it to bits first. The Manhattan Project tells of how 16-year-old Paul S... read more read more...tephens (Christopher Collet) tries to alert his community to the dangers of nuclear energy. John Mathewson (John Lithgow), a doctor in a pharmaceutical research plant wherein covert plutonium experiments are taking place, is the boyfriend of Paul's mom, Elizabeth (Jill Eikenberry). While Mathewson is romantically occupied, Paul and his girl, Jenny Anderman (Cynthia Nixon), steal the plutonium and construct their own atomic bomb. They do this, of course, as a warning to foolhardy grown-ups -- none more foolhardy than the folks who put up good money to make this film. The Manhattan Project was directed by longtime Woody Allen collaborator Marshall Brickman, whose expert sense of comic timing obscures the thickheaded "message" of this picture. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

Flixster Users

47% liked it

4,974 ratings

Critics

47% liked it

17 critics

PG-13, 1 hr. 52 min.

Directed by: Marshall Brickman

Release Date: June 13, 1986

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: June 4, 2002

Stats: 137 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (137)


  • October 6, 2011
    Paul (Christopher Collet) is your typical slacker genius, with a bit of a bad streak. One day, he crosses paths with John Mathewson (John Lithgow), a nuclear physicist who arrives in his peaceful suburban hometown to set up a plutonium refinery hidden behind the less threatening ... read morefaçade of Medatomics, a company specializing in nuclear medicine. Sure enough, Mathewson starts to get soft on Paul's mom, so he invites Paul out to the lab to check out the cool lasers and get some bonding time in. What Mathewson fails to realize is that Paul doesn't just have his head in the big books, he's a borderline criminal mastermind with a flair for the dramatic. Little does Paul know, the plutonium he's about to hijack is 99.997% pure. This mutual misunderstanding forms the basis behind the rest of the plot to follow.

    Aided by Jenny (a teenaged Cynthia Nixon of "Sex and the City" fame), Paul builds from scratch his own private nuclear bomb, perhaps for the political activism aspect, but most likely for the challenge.

    He's the unassuming punk of the science fair, a sarcastic, easygoing prankster surrounded by quirky science nerds who won't get laid until they're 37. This isn't his scene, and he's not here to compete with these kids. His aspirations are grander. At which point, Mathewson makes the connection his plutonium is missing. That's when this innocent scholarly pursuit goes horribly, horribly wrong.

    Let's just say Paul's brand of political activism is performance art. And the name of his piece is "mutually assured destruction."

    The Manhattan Project has more soul than most '80s "science whiz" movies in its class. A lively, charming bomb construction montage, and the product placement of Duracell on the bomb itself, have "classic" written all over them. Snappy, wisecracking dialogue decorates the script: "Jenny...I never thought I'd say this to anybody, but...I gotta go get the atomic bomb out of the car."

    Most of the time, it's a lighthearted, idealistic retelling of the Radioactive Boy Scout - less a cautionary tale and more of a "kids versus the adults" caper. Scenes of Paul implementing devious chemistry, pranking the class know-it-all with home-brewed explosives, and outwitting security guards, government personnel, and the military puts this movie in the same league as Wargames.

    Half the fun is watching how easily Paul manipulates his environment: He fires up computer consoles in a government lab like he's going for the high score at Pac-Man, makes operating a robotic arm look as easy as riding a bike, and maneuvers an RC car with the deftness of Jason Statham in Transporter 3. I laughed particularly at the simplicity with which he acquired C-4 and the nonchalance with which he handled weapons-grade plutonium. Unbelievable? Of course. But it's a hella good time.

    What makes it work is the character of Mathewson: he's far from the preachy buffoon of an authority figure typically relegated to this kind of role. We don't even have any conflict arising from him stepping into the shoes of Paul's absent father. Instead of piling on reasons for him and Paul to be at odds with each other, the writers have crafted a more interesting, respectful relationship. You're endeared to both of them simultaneously, and only want for them to form their inevitable alliance, which is continuously prevented by circumstance.

    There's no pointed commentary here. It's antinuclear proliferation to be sure, but that's about where the political sophistication ends. There is no villain in a black hat...that is, until we reach the end of the second act, where The Manhattan Project suddenly turns into my second-favorite scientists-vs.-military movie behind The Abyss.

    Mathewson is a competent, morally sound realist surrounded by halfcocked gorillas. It's his character whose dramatic arc we're witnessing. He admires Paul for his resourcefulness but doesn't understand his motivations. By the end of the film, he's squaring off with the military himself.

    At one point near the film's frantic climax, he turns aside, hundred-yard-stare, a sheen of sweat on his brow, and you feel his guilt about the power his lab-coated ilk have willfully turned over to the men with big guns and little brains - an exchange that has been going on, in this field of science, since the titular event of 1942.

    Oddly enough, the last ten minutes pack the most comedic punch. Or maybe that's just my devious sense of humor.

    Overall, The Manhattan Project is great fun. An unpretentious script, memorable scenes, and one of Lithgow's best roles (if I may be so bold) make this an undeniable cult classic. If you haven't seen it yet, it's the perfect fix to your '80s nostalgia habit.
  • July 24, 2011
    Elizabeth: Paul, did you build an atomic bomb? 
    Paul: Only a little one. 

    The Manhattan Project is a fun movie; a completely ridiculous and unrealistic one, but fun nevertheless. The story is about a high school student, Paul, who is a science genius. When he is invited by his m... read moreothers new male interest to a laboratory, he goes excitedly. When he gets there, he notices thing that make it seem like they are building atomic bombs there. So he comes back another night, breaks into the government lab, steals some plutonium and then builds an atomic bomb. Yeah, I said it was unrealistic. 

    There's nothing here that is too fantastic. The performances aren't the greatest and the story obviously has it's share of problems. With that said, I was entertained throughout, so I would give it a mild recommendation, but there is something about the movie that does really annoy me. That would be that the hero of the movie Paul puts millions of people's lives in jeopardy and is still considered the hero. I don't want to give the ending away, but it really sort of pissed me off to say the least. The ending makes an already completely unrealistic movie all the more, unrealistic.

    It may sound like I really hate this movie and I guess I really do dislike the idea of it, but like I said before it was entertaining. In the end thats all I wanted this movie to be. It didn't have to be a smart thrill, just an entertaining one. 
  • January 27, 2011
    Another good teen movie about the whole nuclear crisis of the 80s. This is an incredible story, but a good one too. I liked it.
  • June 10, 2009
    Contemporary comedy-adventure-thriller concerns a high-school youth who, with the aid of his idealistic girlfriend, steals some plutonium and makes his own nuclear bomb. There's a pleasing balance of humour and suspense.
  • November 26, 2009
    "A Cult Classic", in the same way as "Office Space, Hackers,Idiocracy,Raw Deal", and many others."

    A pretty msart and gripping thriller, but some scenes were pretty inadequate, or insufficent, and with that said, It is just a "Three Star Film", unlike i thought in the begginin... read moreg of giving it more."
  • September 30, 2008
    A sort of cousing to "WarGames", this movie stars John Lithgow as a nuclear scientist who has developed the most pure form of plutonium known to man. The government sets him up in a laboratory in Ithaca, NY where he begins to date a local realtor played by Jill Eikenberry. Chisto... read morepher Collet plays her son, the science genius of the local high school. When he discovers what Lithgow is doing at the local factory, he devises a plan to steal a sample of the plutonium, and build a home made nuclear bomb...so he can with the science fair. With the help of his girlfriend, "Sex And The City"s Cynthia Nixon, he develops a scheme that's about as plausible as Matthew Broderick hacking into the nation's defense computer and starting World War III. What the movie has over WarGames is a real sense of tension. In WarGames, the military and government agents all seemed like rednecks and doofuses. They never really posed a credible threat. Here, the goverment is no nonsense, and you are shown that they are more than willing to kill this kid, who they see as a terrorist threat. Once the bomb is built, it's a cat and mouse game as the kid tries to avoid the government, while not realizing the danger he is in. He's convinced the government can't do anything to him because he's underage. When the device is accidentally activated, he finds out REAL fast how wrong he is. For the most part, the acting is strong and believable. Lithgow is one of the most versatile actors going, and he's great here. Collet is an actor who we never heard much from after this, but he's totally convincing as the science geek, filled with the self righteousness that only teenagers can posess. Nixon's performance may be fine, but her character is annoying. She's a hardheaded know it all with a big chip on her shoulder. At one point she even tells of government agents by defiantly stating that "I KNOW MY RIGHTS!!". Her character is the only weak spot in an otherwise outstanding 80's Cold War thriller.
  • April 24, 2008
    Good film, well written and a cracking story.
  • July 24, 2011
    Classic 80s cable movie without the nudity and drugs. It was Must See TV when on HBO. How does it hold up....not very well. Some thing should be left in the past. The last twenty minutes is where it's at with a powerhouse performance from Lithgow. If the movie was made today... read more, it wouldn't resemble this at all. I'm calling it, we need a remake now!
  • January 18, 2010
    I saw this years ago, before I really understood what the Manhattan Project was but I thought it was bizarre but decent. I really like John Lithgow and he did a good job in the movie.
  • January 1, 2007
    A well-made fast paced thriller that has a pretty good plot. Christopher Collet plays an overachieving high school student make a bomb with plutonium stolen from a scientist played by (John Lithgow) One of the funniest lines in the movie, is "does anyone have a Philips head scre... read morewdriver? if you have not seen the movie you will know why when you see it.

Critic Reviews


David Cornelius
July 12, 2007
David Cornelius, DVDTalk.com

The Manhattan Project remains a clever time capsule of 80s nuclear commentary and a timeless, endlessly watchable thriller. Full Review

Frederic and Mary Ann Brussat
August 25, 2004
Frederic and Mary Ann Brussat, Spirituality and Practice

Many viewers will find themselves cheering for the military men and FBI agents a they try to stop this self-centered kid from achieving his dream of personal glory.

Christopher Null
February 10, 2004
Christopher Null, Filmcritic.com

a highly underrated film that anyone can enjoy -- even if you aren't a massive, massive nerd. Full Review

Nell Minow
August 15, 2002
Nell Minow, Movie Mom at Yahoo! Movies

Surprisingly biting film with great performances by Cynthia Nixon and John Lithgow

Scott Weinberg
August 12, 2002
Scott Weinberg, Apollo Guide

Often more exasperating than it is entertaining. Full Review

Dennis Schwartz
January 1, 2000
Dennis Schwartz, Ozus' World Movie Reviews

There was something absorbing about these nuclear scientists doing their job. Full Review

March 26, 2009
Variety

Click to read the article Full Review

Vincent Canby
August 30, 2004
Vincent Canby, New York Times

Click to read the article Full Review

Dave Kehr
January 1, 2000
Dave Kehr, Chicago Reader

Click to read the article Full Review

Roger Ebert
January 1, 2000
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

Click to read the article Full Review

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • WarGames (War Games)
    WarGames (War Games) (75%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

The Manhattan Pro... : Watch Free on TV


The Manhattan Project Trivia


  • Paul Stevens' high school science project has gotten a little out of hand. He just built an atomic bomb. Now he's got 11 hours to make sure it doesn't work.  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for The Manhattan Project. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?