Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Cate Blanchett, Geoffrey Rush, Clive Owen, Rhys Ifans, Jordi Molla ... see more see more... , Abbie Cornish , Samantha Morton , Tom Hollander , Antony Carrick , David Threlfall , Eddie Redmayne , John Shrapnel , Laurence Fox , Adrian Scarborough , Steven Robertson , Tim Preece , Sam Spruell

Actress Cate Blanchett returns to her Oscar-nominated role and director Shekhar Kapur steps back into the director's chair for this belated sequel to the critically acclaimed 1998 biopic Elizabeth tha... read more read more...t explores the 16th century romance between the "Virgin Queen" and noted adventurer Sir Walter Raleigh (Clive Owen). Michael Hirst teams with William Nicholson to pen the screenplay, and actor Geoffrey Rush returns to the role of Sir Francis Walsingham. ~ Jason Buchanan, Rovi

Flixster Users

62% liked it

355,959 ratings

Critics

35% liked it

164 critics

DVD Release Date: February 5, 2008

Get It:

Stats: 17,469 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (17,469)


  • April 2, 2012
    This unofficial sequel to Shekhar Kapur's first film about Queen Elisabeth the First manages to reunite the fantastic Cate Blanchett and Geoffrey Rush, reprising their roles and keeping the visual style about the queen's first years of reign. This is the story of her flirt with S... read moreir Walter Raleigh and the threat of the Spanish armada. Even if the film is a tad slow at times, the mix of intrigues, politics and personal issues works great again. Several factors raise this film high above an interesting but dry history lesson: wonderful costumes, the really unique camera work, Cate Blanchett giving another truly outstanding performance, Clive Owen and his charming charisma, an all around great cast and a very powerful finale with the prettiest sailing ship battles you have ever seen (although admittedly, after the amazing trailer you could have hoped for even more of those). Very good and worth seeing for everyone even remotely interested in the genre.
  • October 29, 2011
    Phenomenal sequel to Elizabeth, Cate Blanchett delivers a stunning performance in the title role. Though the film has gotten some flack for its romantic storyline, it's also part of history. I thought that this film was just as strong as the first, and that Blanchett delivered ye... read moret again. The film is a great looking piece of cinema, and the story, though slow at times is well plotted, and the pacing is just right for the great climax of the film. There are enough good things going for this film to forgive its slight imperfections. The performances alone make this a strong, flawless and powerful film. As far as sequels are concerned, Elizabeth: The Golden Age belongs on the short list of films that are just as good as or better than the original. Elizabeth: The Golden Age is a great film with a strong story and great performances. The film is just as good as the original, and despite its flaws, there are enough good things about this film to really enjoy it. The film is entertaining, and slow, but for a film like this, the pacing is just perfect. Elizabeth: The Golden Age is a great film, and along with the first film is a solid piece of cinema that should appeal to history fans. If you can forgive the love story, you'll enjoy this. A brilliant film with great performances make this a must see. A very enjoyable film that is a splendid period piece. A must see.
  • October 3, 2011
    This is the sequel to the film that made Cate Blanchett's career, and, while it does have it's moments, it doesn't quite live up to the level set by its predecessor.

    The story this time out focuses on a few things: the schemings of Mary Queen of Scots, the campaign against the ... read moreSpanish Armada, and a possible romance between Elizabeth and Sir Walter Raleigh. It's all some good stuff, but there's not quite as much subtext present this time around.

    The cosumes and sets are wonderful yes, but the film seems to favor them more over having a stronger story with more historical accuracy and more development. Also, the film is rather slow and plodding, and feels far longer than it is. On the other hand though, there's great cinematography, the battle at the end is well done and provides some sort of pay off, and the performances are pretty good. Blanchett once again shows why she was born to play this part, Rush is once again good as Sir Francis Walsingham (though not quite as scary/badass as before), and Clive Owen is quite good as Sir Walter Raleigh, really owning the screen everytime he shows up.

    This isn't a terrible film, but it was kind of disappointing. I still kinda liked it, or at least some parts more than others, but I say stick with the first one instead, and maybe only see this if you feel you need to be a completist.
  • February 17, 2011
    Not quite as good as the first one, but still pretty interesting.
  • December 31, 2010
    "Based upon" the life of Elizabeth I, The Golden Age is the kind of film that causes the words "sumptuous" and "lavish" to be bandied around, but it seemed to me to be somehow very TV standard. It is littered with historical innaccuracies and the superficial script plays out like... read more a greatest hits of the events of her life, spending little time on the inter-relationship of characters, their motivations or the context in which they acted. Elizabeth is shown as a strong, perceptive and wily monarch while Clive Owen's Raleigh is little more than a Mills & Boon style swashbuckler who single handedly defeated the Spanish Armada (quite how he got promoted from potato discoverer to one man seventh fleet I don't know...) The direction concentrates far too much on pre-Raphaelite imagery and demotes the dialogue to brief exchanges of clipped soundbites and for a historical epic, it all seems very unconvincing. Taken as a romanticized adventure, the attractive visuals and appealing cast make it watchable enough, but peek beneath its petticoats and it's little more than a medieval soap opera.
  • November 5, 2010
    As good as the first one, but for different reasons. I liked the second Elizabeth film for its increased action and for Clive Owen, who steadily stole every scene he was in. I was wishing for Shakespeare to make an appearance, but the defeat of the Spanish Armada was a fine conso... read morelation prize. While watching it, there was an element that I liked less than the original, but looking back it's already escaped me. Clearly not an important flaw! Both Elizabeth films are worthwhile pursuits, grand and epic and more-or-less historically accurate without being boring. I do recommend.
  • August 3, 2010
    Two Aussies playing the roles of Britain's historical figures, and yet everything works out for the best. It feels like an episode of the Tudors mixed with The Man for All Seasons.
  • July 29, 2010
    really boring and a waste of my time. C-
  • December 21, 2009
    Unlike the first and far superior film, this film is riddled with historical inaccuracies. It's actually quite shocking and insulting and I'm afraid Shekhar Kapur's reputation is in tatters. The film looks beautiful and the Armada scene was visually stunning, it just needed to be... read more longer (I'd like to see it have its own film to be honest) and more truthful, Sir Walter Raleigh had nothing to do with it, he wasn't even there! Visually stunning, brilliant performances but it makes a complete mockery of British history and it is both insulting and unforgivable. No wonder kids are so bleeding thick these days! A real shame. One and a half stars for Cate Blanchett and Samantha Morton?s performances only.
  • fb619846742
    October 26, 2009
    fb619846742
    A decent, but overall flawed look on Queen Elizabeth, her love affair with Sir Walter Raleigh, and how she ignited a war with Spain. It seems the love story was meant to be secondary, but it takes on more importance as the film goes on, while the plot that should've been primary,... read more that being Elizabeth and the war with Spain, takes a step back. The acting, as expected, is very good, with Owen proving to be a fine fit as Raleigh. However, when the excitement finally kicks into gear, it seems a little too late.

Critic Reviews


Jonathan F. Richards
October 19, 2007
Jonathan F. Richards, Film.com

This is romantic fantasy, not history, and much of the time you fully expect Kapur, here making his third post-Bollywood feature, to turn his cast loose in song and dance. Full Review

Andrew Sarris
October 17, 2007
Andrew Sarris, New York Observer

Shekhar Kapur's Elizabeth: The Golden Age, from a screenplay by William Nicholson and Michael Hirst, turned out to be more rousingly entertaining than many of its less-than-lukewarm reviews had led me... Full Review

Richard Roeper
October 15, 2007
Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper

I can almost recommend this film as a great-looking, bombastic guilty pleasure. But the soundtrack is unbearable, the soap opera love triangle -- laughable.

Colin Covert
October 12, 2007
Colin Covert, Minneapolis Star Tribune

Bogus history can make a crackling good adventure yarn, and Kapur piles on the treachery and romance. Full Review

Elizabeth Weitzman
October 12, 2007
Elizabeth Weitzman, New York Daily News

From its extravagant costumes to its pompous score, The Golden Age is packed with distractions. But the biggest of all is the story itself, which works so mightily to tarnish the queen at its core. Full Review

Lou Lumenick
October 12, 2007
Lou Lumenick, New York Post

Expect a fast-paced, beautifully mounted and well-acted soap opera with overripe dialogue that plays fast and loose with history -- just like they did in the '30s, '40s and '50s -- and you won't come ... Full Review

Stephen Whitty
October 12, 2007
Stephen Whitty, Newark Star-Ledger

Even the chance to see Cate Blanchett strut and fret upon the stage, shooting haughty glances left and right, isn't enough reason to tour this rambling Tudor mansion, full of overstuffed bedrooms and ... Full Review

Ruthe Stein
October 12, 2007
Ruthe Stein, San Francisco Chronicle

The danger in making a costume drama is that all of it will be as lifeless as wax figures. Kapur escapes this fate by relying on sex and a luminous star capable of being at once regal and alluring. Full Review

Bruce Newman
October 12, 2007
Bruce Newman, San Jose Mercury News

Every time the camera finally settles on Blanchett's regal cheekbones, it's a relief. Full Review

Peter Howell
October 12, 2007
Peter Howell, Toronto Star

Elizabeth: The Golden Age places its gilded head upon the chopping block right from the opening salvo, replacing its predecessor's cunning with bombast. Full Review

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Elizabeth
    Elizabeth (96%)
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous (100%)
  • Elizabeth I
    Elizabeth I (92%)
  • The Young Victoria
    The Young Victoria (96%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Elizabeth: The Go... : Watch Free on TV


Elizabeth: The Golden Age Trivia


  • In the movie, Elizabeth, The Golden Age, which country does England go to war with?  Answer »
  • What famous pirate is a major character in the movie Elizabeth, The Golden Age?  Answer »
  • What Queen does Queen Elizabeth execute in the movie Elizabeth, The Golden Age?  Answer »
  • What Spanish King is at war with Queen Elizabeth in the movie Elizabeth, The Golden Age?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin