Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Jeffrey Combs, Bruce Abbott, Claude Earl Jones, Fabiana Udenio, David Gale ... see more see more... , Kathleen Kinmont , Irene Forrest , Michael Strasser , David Lee Bynum , Jay Evans , Friday , Kim Parker , Rebeca Recio , Charles Schneider , Mary Sheldon , Mel Stewart , Marge Turner , Johnny Legend , Billy DaMota , Craig Noble

Loosely adapted from H.P. Lovecraft's Herbert West -- Re-Animator comes this sequel to one of the wildest, bloodiest, and funniest horror films to ever come down the pipe. Set eight months after the g... read more read more...ruesome events of the first film, the follow-up opens with the demented Dr. Herbert West (Jeffrey Combs) continuing to perfect his "re-agent" formula to regenerate dead tissue with the help of his ever-troubled assistant Dr. Dan Cain (Bruce Abbott). New characters include suspicious policeman Lt. Chapham (Claude Earl Jones) and Cain's old flame Francesca (Fabiana Udenio). Returning to Miskatonic Hospital after a short stint in the military, West and the reluctant, often unwitting Cain plan to create new life from a patchwork of body parts -- including the heart of Cain's beloved girlfriend. However, things quickly get out of hand thanks to the snooping of Lt. Chapham and the return of the evil decapitated Dr. Hill (David Gale) who wants revenge for his beheading. There's also the problem of West's dozens of oddball creations who want out of the dungeon they are trapped within. It all comes to a head as Cain and West resurrect their "bride" just as Dr. Hill literally flies in to take his vengeance with the help of West's freakish creations. ~ Patrick Legare, Rovi

Flixster Users

51% liked it

7,525 ratings

Critics

47% liked it

15 critics

R, 1 hr. 39 min.

Directed by: Brian Yuzna

Release Date: December 31, 1990

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: August 19, 2003

Get It:

Stats: 365 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (365)


  • November 18, 2009
    Just as crazy and hilarious as the first, Jeffrey Combs is amazing. I love how he can come across as nuts, smart and funny all in one. The plot was really good, it kept you involved the entire time. I think what made it such a good follow up is that it gave you everything you lov... read moreed from the original and enhanced it. The ruthless and gross out gore was done oh so classy.
  • September 30, 2009
    Not quite as good as the first but lots of gore and lots of fun. Couldn't help but feel sad for the bride though *sniff*
  • August 20, 2007
    It's a disappointing sequel to the original "Re-animator" because it really copies the "Bride of Frankenstein" storyline too much and still has nothing to do with H.P. Lovecraft's tale.
    It's still quite good though because you get to see lots of Fabiana Udenio. She isn't much of... read more an actress but she's quite a babe.
    With its larger budget, you can't fault the film for gore effects or humour either but it's just not as fresh...
  • December 25, 2006
    I defy anyone to explain how the opening sequence fits into the chronology of events.
  • December 28, 2011
    ** out of ****

    "Bride of Re-Animator" is a nearly bad movie saved by a few inspired moments of intended lunacy. A sequel (and somewhat of a re-hash) to Stuart Gordon's "Re-Animator" - which was an adaptation of the stories concocted in H.P. Lovecrafts "Herbert West-Reanimator"... read more - the film feels more like a test of patience (and taste) rather than successful horror-satire. While its predecessor reaches the level of brilliant, appealing (?) trash; the sequel seems to drag on-and-on; forever attempting to find a point to exist, and never quite finding one.

    Is it a bad film? No, in theory; this doesn't quite qualify as one. It's a film of many bad moments, many missed opportunities - yes - but it's also better than a lot of horror sequels out there. In some respects, I can say I respect it. "Bride of Re-Animator" is what it is; and if you watched the first film in the franchise for the gore effects alone - and not the sharp satire or refreshingly over-the-top acting - you probably won't be too disappointed by what this one has to offer.

    Still, it pales in comparison to Gordon's original. This sequel finds mad scientist Herbert West (Jeffrey Combs) and his partner-in-crime Dan Cain (Bruce Abbot) returning for another go-round with West's experimentations in the reanimation of human body parts and full corpses. The concept still remains fascinating and intelligent; although at least in "Re-Animator" it felt new and fresh, while here it feels slightly recycled, and not in a particularly good way.

    Anyways, I'm drifting; Herbert and Dan are moved from Peru back to Arkham, Massachusetts; where they resume their roles as doctors at Miskatonic University Hospital. Both men are ready to put the events of the first film behind them; even if the fellow doctors and medical students are much less accepting. Nonetheless, Herbert and Dan settle in a house-by-the-cemetery and make themselves at home.

    For a while, I was wondering: what happened to Dan's girlfriend Megan? The ending of "Re-Animator" was a genuine cliff-hanger; we were left to wonder whether Herbert's infamous serum would revive her full-time, or if it was too late. Apparently, it WAS too late; she doesn't even make an appearance in this film, and Dan has a new love interest; an Italian beauty named Francesca (Fabiana Udenio).

    But of course, Herbert is feeling a bit lonely himself; and his latest experiment is so create a mate. A "bride" for the re-animator. He shall complete his creation with the heart of Dan's former girlfriend, the legs of a hooker, and various other body parts as well. Meanwhile, a snooping police officer (Claude Earl Jones) has his suspicions about West; most of which are derived from the deranged madman's peculiar past. This same officer soon meets the re-animated head of Dr. Hill (David Gale) - who is out for blood after having suffered through the events of the first film; forgotten, and neglected.

    "Bride of Re-Animator" may be short on depth, winning satire, and wit; but it certainly isn't short on blood, gore, and special effects! If it all comes down to visual detail, the sequel to "Re-Animator" is a goddamn master-class freak-show; although since it never quite comes down to that, it feels unpolished and unfinished. That isn't to say that all will feel the way I did; some might settle for the gory make-up effects alone, because they are undeniably impressive on their own right. And of course, the satire might work for those people too; I just wish it had for me.

    As always, Combs is very convincing as Herbert West; although even here, his performance feels slightly inferior to the one in "Re-Animator". It's still over-the-top, and it makes for one of this sequel's few key pleasures, but there's an ingredient missing; and it's pretty darn critical. But at the end of the day, "Bride of Re-Animator" is a mixed bag of the good, the bad, and the ugly. Whether it's messy methods of storytelling and style-setting work for you or not really depends on your personal tastes as a film-goer. While I'm no doubt the kind of viewer who can sometimes just sit back and enjoy the campy, gore-happy ride; this one just didn't impress me a whole lot.
  • May 3, 2011
    In my opinion the first installment is an excellent cult classic horror movie which didn't need to be RE-ANIMATED with this unsatisfying sequel. "Bride of the re-animator" has its funny, gory and scary moments but the pace drags most of the time and it feels substantially less in... read morespired that left me a very unpleasant feeling about it.

    Perhaps easily forgettable, this flick still has it's moments and deserves at least a moment of the gorehound's time, otherwise, I wouldn't recommended you to married this BRIDE.

    Leave her at the altar!!!.
  • February 25, 2008
    Actually closer to the HP Lovecraft story than the first.
  • November 21, 2007
    While not as good as the first film, this one is still entertaining as hell with outrageous effects by Screaming Mad George. I haven't seen it in a long time and I'm scared to ruin the memories considering what I think of director Yuzna's output now.
  • May 4, 2007
    part 2 in the Re-animator series not as great as the first but still worth watching a few times
  • September 13, 2011
    While there are plenty of fun scenes and moments, I have to agree with the general consensus that this film is an unsatisfying continuation of the original. It is a little too long and drag at times. Dan and Herbert have been busy in the eight month since the previous film, an... read mored are now working on not just reanimation of dead tissue, but of creating life. It is VERY Frankenstein...in a good way. But Dr. Hill's head is shoehorned into the plot for little reason, other than he ends up with bat wings coming out of his head and can fly. For the most part he detracts from the good bits, which is a shame because in the first film he WAS one of the good bits. I can't say its too terrible, and it may be enough for the average horror fan, but it just doesn't move as swiftly as the first.

Critic Reviews


Variety Staff
March 26, 2009
Variety Staff, Variety

The over-the-top acting that Gordon encouraged in Re-Animator is continued here with Combs particularly adept at the darkly comic throwaway line. Full Review

Vincent Canby
August 30, 2004
Vincent Canby, New York Times

Less a sequel to the critically praised 1985 horror film Re-Animator than a rehash based on the same H. P. Lovecraft stories. Full Review

Richard Harrington
January 1, 2000
Richard Harrington, Washington Post

Brian Yusna has replaced Stuart Gordon in the director's chair, without bringing new life to the affair. Even the jokes in the Woody Keith/Rick Fry screenplay seem refried, suggesting that all too muc... Full Review

August 21, 2009
TV Guide's Movie Guide

It can't come up with any really great plot points that weren't covered in the original, so it rehashes them to a boring degree. Full Review

August 21, 2009
Film4

Absolutely tasteless, glorious, gory fun with special effects from a crew of specialists who have, as one critic wrote, just gone abracadaver. Full Review

Stefan Birgir Stefansson
January 29, 2008
Stefan Birgir Stefansson, sbs.is

Could have been better but still a fine sequel.

Geoff Andrew
June 24, 2006
Geoff Andrew, Time Out

The excessive blood-spurting gruesomeness and cartoonish stop-motion effects trivialise the horror and undercut the would-be black humour in this travestied sequel to Stuart Gordon's hugely enjoyable ... Full Review

Walter Chaw
October 31, 2003
Walter Chaw, Film Freak Central

If it lacks the intimate cohesion of the first film despite its desire to resurrect a feeling of doomed love, it at least isn't coy about ladling out the goodies. Full Review

Scott Weinberg
October 22, 2003
Scott Weinberg, eFilmCritic.com

While Re-Animator has wit and audacity and gore and ferocity to spare, Bride of Re-Animator has gore... and the same actors. Full Review

Christopher Null
September 7, 2003
Christopher Null, Filmcritic.com

not particularly scary Full Review

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Re-Animator
    Re-Animator (92%)
  • Angry and Moist: An Undead Chronicle
    Angry and Moist: An Undead Chronicle (100%)
  • [Rec] 2
    [Rec] 2 (0%)
  • Slugs
    Slugs (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

The Bride of Re-A... : Watch Free on TV


The Bride of Re-Animator Trivia


  • Bride of Re-Animator- The events of the previous movie are referred to as what in this film?   Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for The Bride of Re-Animator. Want to create one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?