Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Rhys Ifans, Denis Leary, Martin Sheen ... see more see more... , Sally Field , Irfan Khan , Campbell Scott , Embeth Davidtz , Chris Zylka , Max Charles , C. Thomas Howell , Jake Keiffer , Kari Coleman , Michael Barra , Leif Gantvoort , Andy Pessoa , Hannah Marks , Kelsey Chow , Kevin McCorkle , Andy Gladbach , Ring Hendricks-Tellefsen , Barbara Eve Harris , Stan Lee , Danielle Burgio , Tom Waite , Keith Campbell , Steve DeCastro , Jill Flint , Mark Daughtery , Milton Gonzalez , Skyler Gisondo , Charlie DePew , Jacob Rodier , Vincent Laresca , Damien Lemon , Ty Upshaw , James Chen , Alexander Bedria , Tia Texada , Jay Caputo , John Burke , Terry Bozeman , Jennifer Lyons , Michael Massee , Amber Stevens , Scott Campbell , Annie Parisse , Julianne Nicholson , Irrfan Khan

The Amazing Spider-Man is the story of Peter Parker (Garfield), an outcast high schooler who was abandoned by his parents as a boy, leaving him to be raised by his Uncle Ben (Sheen) and Aunt May (Fiel... read more read more...d). Like most teenagers, Peter is trying to figure out who he is and how he got to be the person he is today. As Peter discovers a mysterious briefcase that belonged to his father, he begins a quest to understand his parents' disappearance - leading him directly to Oscorp and the lab of Dr. Curt Connors (Ifans), his father's former partner. As Spider-Man is set on a collision course with Connors' alter-ego, The Lizard, Peter will make life-altering choices to use his powers and shape his destiny to become a hero. -- (C) Sony

Flixster Users

77% liked it

806,323 ratings

Critics

73% liked it

284 critics

DVD Release Date: November 9, 2012

Stats: 28,278 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (28,278)


  • May 13, 2014
    The AMAZING Spider-Man? well not quite. With the Raimi franchise finished only five years ago in 2007 did we need a reboot of this super hero? in my opinion no we didn't and this film hasn't really changed my mind.

    One can't deny the impressive new visuals and ideas for this new... read more feature, Spider-Man does look good with new state of the art CGI effects and Spidey POV as he streaks across the night sky. The suit is pretty much the same albeit for some minor cosmetic differences, but Spider-Man's new moves during fights and skyscraper swinging are much more elaborate, sexy and closer to the classic motions we all know and love from the comics and those top notch Capcom 2D fighters even!.

    That said I still see no point in this film other than to show off what I just pointed out. Yes Spider-Man looks much slicker as he should five years after the last film but other than that there is nothing new here. I might add its only Spider-Man that looks good in this film, Lizard looks pretty ropy if you ask me. Close ups of his face and eyes especially are pretty nice but when the action kicks in he looks like a dodgy Godzilla with a weird facial design. Obviously trying to look somewhat like the actor Ifans but it doesn't work too well.

    The plot for 'Lizard' is also kinda loose too really. He wants to turn everyone into lizards hmmm. Wouldn't that kinda make him no longer special? if everyone was the same as him he wouldn't be the strongest being around anymore, more importantly...why do this?. On another note, again I realise this is a comicbook adaptation but isn't this plot like something out of a kids Saturday morning cartoon? to be more precise...a TMNT cartoon.

    A lot of the film is so darn stupid also, OK its a comicbook adaptation but it just seems they have tried too hard plus trying to squeeze too much into the one film. The origins segments seem to fly past and before you know it he's Spider-Man and everyone is calling him that!. There isn't much exploration of his suit creation, he just makes it...just like that and things happen that are just too daft to make any sense.

    'Parker's' first use of his spider powers on the subway home is one example. some guy does something completely pointless whilst Parker sleeps (balances a beer bottle on his forehead?? duh!?). He awakes startled and leaps onto the carriage roof, sticking there, he jumps down and accidentally rips off a woman's top with his sticky fingers. Straight away some guys completely forget about the amazing feet they just saw and try to beat him up...as you would do of course.

    Then of course there is all the obligatory high school fluff where Parker does things slightly out of the ordinary yet no one ever seems to think how. Yes I know its all part of the comicbook lore and gives the film some funny moments but my god its so cliched.

    Personally I see nothing here that beats the Raimi franchise by any great lengths. Naturally the effects are much better but cast wise I actually prefer Maguire (although Dunst was terrible). Garfield was quite annoying I found and didn't have any of the emotion, probably down to the fact Maguire is a good actor and Garfield is not...whoever he is.

    I just feel this is all so ridiculous, they could do this every other year, just remake the same film with a pretty new cast and sparkly new effects, slap some gloss on the top and voila! yet another brand new origins remake. The thing is everyone will rush to see it too! (yes I see the irony in myself having seen it but I have a good reason for this...I'm a hypocrite). Its the same as before in a shiny new wrapper people! Hollywood must be rubbing their hands with glee.

    With the amount of super hero films made and being made there really is no need for remakes/reboots of franchises that aren't very old. There are plenty of really good super hero characters out there Hollywood, lets see some of them get an adaptation, stop churning out the same spiel over and over!.

    Purely by the numbers cookie cutter film making in every sense and offers nothing new. There are some nice fight sequences between Spidey and Lizard yes but that's it, I get the impression that's the only reason they made this, to show off cool fights between cool comicbook characters. Cast aside the only differences are the change in villain and the visuals are prettier, everything else is as you would expect so where's the fun?.
  • fb733768972
    April 30, 2014
    fb733768972
    Giving a film a darker tone does not necessarily mean it is going to make it better, but this film does it properly. Keeping in mind that there is a definitely recognition of scenes missing for details, Where do I begin? "Spider-Man" has been attempted in the past, but never have... read more I felt this much REAL emotion from a superhero film. The Sam Raimi trilogy will always stand as the benchmark of modern-day superhero flicks, giving these new Spidey films something to really strive for. In this film, the depth of the characters is phenomenal, the never-before-seen backstory is told beautifully (although not explored enough), the realization scenes before the transformation is great, and the film is structured so much better this time around. The deaths actually made me cry, because they took their time and spent the right amount of screen time to show the emotions that should be felt by the audience. The CG work is better than I expected, although they could have tweaked a few details. I don't really have any complaints about this film. One of the most powerful portions of the film is the chemistry between Peter Parker and Gwen Stacey, and the character of Dr. Curt Connors/The Lizard was portrayed beautifully by Rhys Ifans. Forget Tobey Maguire, Andrew Garfield owns Spider-Man, and "The Amazing Spider-Man" may not be worthy of the title "Amazing," but it sure is fantastic!
  • April 17, 2014
    Spider-Man was by no means a film that needed rebooting. But The Amazing Spider-Man is about on par in terms of quality; it's just a different interpretation. Director Marc Webb injects this film with his indie romantic sensibility, creating a film that is first and foremost abou... read moret relationships. Andrew Garfield is a great Peter Parker and a better Spider-Man, and you couldn't find a better Gwen Stacy than Emma Stone. This origin story has just as much intelligence as it does special effects.
  • April 8, 2014
    A far more loyal film towards the comics than Sam Raimi's trilogy. However, it doesn't mean that this film is better than Raimi's. Even though Tim Burton's Batman films were more faithful to the comics, Christopher Nolan's trilogy is widely considered the better out of the two. A... read morend in this case, even though I liked this new one, I grew up with Sam Raimi's trilogy and to have a reboot come about so shortly is more than not called for. Even though Andrew Garfield gave a strong performance, I just still prefer Tobey Maguire's Spider-Man. While the Lizard is an impressive villan with Rhys Ifans' superb portrayal, it ultimately doesn't top Alfred Molina's Dr Octopus or Willem Dafoe's Green Goblin. Overall, this reboot doesn't live up to being "Amazing" as its title implies, but it's still Spider-Man and even though it may not top Sam Raimi's trilogy, this introduces another way of watching the web slinger on the big screen.
    P.S. Because of J.K Simmons' brilliant portrayal as J.Jonah Jameson in the trilogy, if they ever bring that character into this reboot franchise, I feel no one else can really top his performance, so they'd better have Simmons or no one for that role.
  • March 9, 2014
    The only thing "Amazing" about this Spiderman Film is that the script made it to the screen. Dreadful.
  • July 31, 2013
    Garfield and Stone are great! But I think I am getting too old to enjoy the comics made movies now.
  • May 6, 2013
    I'm not sure we really needed this re-boot so soon after the other films! It seems to stay faithful to a lot of the ideas behind Spiderman and therefore some scenes are just like the first film, which makes me think why not try something totally different?! It's a good film thoug... read moreh and the action and SFX are very good, overall I think it missed some of the charm of the recent first film.
  • March 30, 2013
    Andrew Garfield is my hero. In fact, he's my super-hero.
  • March 14, 2013
    The Amazing Spider-Man, an apparently pointless reboot, is surprisingly engaging, due to a intelligent script and a crackerjack cast. Better acted than the previous three films, and with deeper, more three dimensional characters, it is more satisfying in its 'quieter' moments (t... read morehat is, non-CG action scenes) than any of the Toby Maguire films. Where it falls down is in the action and CG scenes in the climax, which look fake and cartoon-ish, and worse, are cliched and perfunctory from a story point of view.

    Andrew Garfield is perfectly cast as the webbed wonder and brings more humor and vulnerability to the role than Toby, who let it be said, was a perfectly good fit for the role as well. Wonderful Emma Stone is a stellar comedy actress, and always sexy, has great chemistry with Garfield, and makes consistently interesting choices as love interest Gwen. Sally Field and Martin Sheen as Peter Parker's uncle and aunt bring gravitas and heart to these normally thankless roles and give better and more interesting performances here than they have in years. (Yes, I think Sally is better here as Aunt May than she was as Mrs. Lincoln). Edgy, dangerous comedian Dennis Leary as Gwen's hard ass New York cop dad Captain Stacy was a wonderful stroke of casting.

    The film is weaker in the realms of bad guy portrayal and action scenes. Welsh character actor Rhys Ifans, usually interesting in whatever he does, brings very little to the part of Dr. Connors /The Lizard. I understand he was responsible for the downfall of Peter's dad, but I couldn't quite get a handle on what was his deal exactly. The morphing effects turning Connors into a giant lizard look absurdly CG and silly, and Ifan's voice and demeanor during his time as Lizard is unconvincing. This is not helped by the script, which blames Lizard's evil ways on his inability to adjust to having a severed arm. He becomes a genetic lizard/human hybrid so he can grow back his limb? Then for no reason that I really understood he infects all of New York with the lizard DNA for which Spiderman must find an antidote.

    There is a fairly thrilling CG sequence with cars dangling off the bridge by Spidey's webs, and Spidey's rescue of a kid from one of the dangling cars. But that scene is so preposterous, it doesn't really get my heart beating fast,though is nonetheless fun. All the CG stuff has the kind of fake glossiness and sheen that takes me out of feeling that any of this is real. Still director Marc Webb seems to have a way with actors, and the move works when the actors get to show their stuff. When the computer and special effects take over, then the film is like a bad video game.

    If you want to blown away by realism or gripped by an evil sinister master plot, look elsewhere. The Amazing Spider-Man is worth a look to see some charismatic and talented actors at the top of their games and truly feeling the angst of Peter Parker himself, losing parents in school, being bullied and struggling with finding his place in the world, equipped with super-strength and the ability to shoot webs out of his wrists. Still the movie's way too long. Still though,it has lots of good stuff. Now I won't be reluctant to pick up the sequel to the prequel, or whatever the next film might be.
  • March 6, 2013
    I thought Marc Webb's version of Spiderman brought a lot to the story that was lacking in Raimi's version but I also think Raimi's version better represented the character of Peter Parker. They are pretty much equal because they are pretty much the same film. Thus, Raimi's versio... read moren is better because it was the original, Webb's version is already a bit tired and feels like a bit of a cash in, neither have got it spot on in my opinion. It also slumps in the middle massively, and the beginning of the film takes ages to get going but the transformation sequence happens within minutes. Overall I was disappointed, Killer Croc was a bit of a disappointment too, everyone has their favourite Spiderman baddie (mine is Mysterio) but I thought he looked a bit rubbish. He also didn't wear his lab coat long enough. Andrew Garfield has yet to convince me either. More action in the 2nd film please, I guess it can only get better.

Critic Reviews


Chris Vognar
July 4, 2012
Chris Vognar, Dallas Morning News

This is a grittier webslinger saga, led by a Peter Parker with swagger and angst and a tone defined more by emotional resonance than wide-eyed wonder. It still has plenty of fizz. Full Review

Dana Stevens
July 3, 2012
Dana Stevens, Slate

This might be a fun summer blockbuster if only it even remotely needed to exist. Full Review

Christopher Orr
July 3, 2012
Christopher Orr, The Atlantic

The Amazing Spider-Man is considerably more fun-and, yes, even touching-than so premature a reboot had any right to be. Full Review

Joshua Rothkopf
July 3, 2012
Joshua Rothkopf, Time Out New York

On the whole, it's passable stuff, a surprise, given how mechanical the masked character seemed. Full Review

Laremy Legel
July 3, 2012
Laremy Legel, Film.com

If you've seen half a dozen superhero films, and the box office results suggest you have, then you've also seen what "The Amazing Spider-Man" has to offer. Full Review

Tom Charity
July 3, 2012
Tom Charity, CNN.com

At 28, Garfield's slightly older than Maguire was when he played Peter Parker in 2002, but his combination of fresh-faced innocence, nervous agitation and wry humor is immediately appealing. Full Review

Bob Mondello
July 3, 2012
Bob Mondello, NPR

Here comes another Spider-dude: This Andrew Garfield guy. So he'd better be really something, right? Well, as it happens, he is. Full Review

Joe Morgenstern
July 3, 2012
Joe Morgenstern, Wall Street Journal

This hugely elaborate production is supposed to be the reboot of a foundering franchise, but rebooting a computer wipes the silicon slate clean. In the movie, what's old is old again. Full Review

Steven Rea
July 3, 2012
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer

Brings fresh faces and 3-D bells and whistles to the adventures of a moody nerd-boy who gets bitten by a radioactive arachnid and morphs into a smart-talking, web-slinging, thug-busting superhero. Full Review

Tom Long
July 3, 2012
Tom Long, Detroit News

How amazing can it be? We all just saw this movie when "Spider-Man" came out a decade ago. Full Review

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Spider-Man
    Spider-Man (92%)
  • Spider-Man 2
    Spider-Man 2 (94%)
  • Spider-Man 3
    Spider-Man 3 (90%)
  • Die Hard 3: With a Vengeance
    Die Hard 3: With a Vengeance (100%)

Facts


    • Peter Parker/Spider-Man: You know in the future if you're gonna steal cars, don't dress like a car thief man.
    • Car Thief: What are you? You're a cop?
    • Peter Parker/Spider-Man: Really? You seriously think I'm a cop?
    • Store Clerk: Stop that guy!
    • Peter Parker/Spider-Man: Not my policy.
    • The Lizard/Dr. Curt Connors: Poor Peter Parker. No father. No mother. No uncle. You're all alone.
    • George Stacy: He's not alone.
    • Peter Parker/Spider-Man: Oh no. Somebody's been a bad lizard.
    • Aunt May: Secrets have a cost. They're not free. Not now, not ever.
    • Dr. Curt Connors: All these souls, lost and alone. I can save them, I can cure them! There's no reason to stop me Peter!

The Amazing Spide... : Watch Free on TV


The Amazing Spider-Man Trivia


  • What actor played Spider-Man in the 1970's series "The Amazing Spider-Man". Hint: he was one of the von Trapp family.  Answer »
  • Superheroes by any other name: Which Superhero is occasionally called, the Amazing Arach-Knight.  Answer »
  • This was the first live-action version of Spidey and depicts him gaining superpowers. His first villain is a new age guru who practices mind control.  Answer »
  • Who plays Gwen Stacy in "The Amazing Spider-Man" (2012)?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin