Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner, Ashley Greene, Rachelle Lefevre ... see more see more... , Billy Burke , Peter Facinelli , Nikki Reed , Kellan Lutz , Jackson Rathbone , Michael Sheen , Dakota Fanning , Edi Gathegi , Graham Greene (II) , Christopher Heyerdahl , Tinsel Korey , Jamie Campbell Bower , Cameron Bright , Noot Seear , Elizabeth Reaser , Daniel Cudmore , Chaske Spencer , Alex Meraz , Kiowa Gordon , Tyson Houseman , Bronson Pelletier , Gil Birmingham , Justine Wachsberger , Christina Jastrzembska , Michael Welch , Justin Chon , Russell J. Roberts , Cam Gigandet , Charlie Bewley , P. Adrien Dorval , Michael D. Adamthwaite , Christian Serratos , Curtis Caravaggio , Michael Kendrick

The supernatural tale of star-crossed lovers continues as the Cullen family flees Forks in order to protect Bella (Kristen Stewart), and the heartbroken high-school senior discovers that vampires aren... read more read more...'t the only creatures in town. Realizing that Bella will never be safe as long as he's around, Edward (Robert Pattinson) makes the difficult decision to leave his beloved behind shortly after her 18th birthday. Reeling from her loss, Bella embraces self-destruction after being comforted by Edward's image during a moment of mortal peril. But as heavy-hearted as Bella may be, her old friend Jacob (Taylor Lautner) distracts her from her sorrows by helping her renovate a weather-beaten motorbike. When Bella encounters a former adversary with a sizable grudge, she's rescued from harm at the last second by pack of enormous, ferocious wolves. Subsequently delving into the history of the Quileutes, Bella discovers the secrets of Jacob's tribe while looking forward to a reunion with Edward that may have deadly consequences. ~ Jason Buchanan, Rovi

Flixster Users

78% liked it

366,378 ratings

Critics

27% liked it

219 critics

PG-13, 2 hr. 10 min.

Directed by: Chris Weitz

Release Date: November 20, 2009

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: March 20, 2010

Get It:

Stats: 72,122 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (72,122)


  • April 8, 2010
    First not horrible for what it is. Ive read the books just so i can make educated opinions on these kind of things. You know fangirls cant stand when you crush their movies if you havent seen them.

    My favorite character in the book is Alice. And Ashley Greene continues to do a ... read morewonderful job in that role in the movies. More Alice please.

    Robert Pattinson . . . wow . .lets just say I dont get it. Now that ive seen trailers for his new movie I even more dont get it. His acting seems just very bad. His dialogue and delivery are just painstakingly bad.

    Taylor Lautner on the other hand given the same horrible words to speak seems to come across more sincere and more believable. Can you even believe stuff in a movie like this?

    All and all seems like they are holding pretty steady to the books. The shapechangers in wolf form look bad ass. The fight scenes do give it a kinda mythical feel. 3 stars for at least staying pretty close to the books and for Ashley Greene :)
  • fb1442511448
    May 13, 2013
    fb1442511448
    The second chapter of the Twilight saga is no better than its first. New Moon possesses no action, a visually satisfying scenery and a dull performance from the cast. The film drags along with its timely duration and slow pace. 2/5
  • March 5, 2013
    OK now this franchise just got really silly, the first film was actually OK in a dumb kiddie kind of way but this sequel is just dumber and VERY frustrating. Stewart's character is so annoying as she sulks around missing 'Edward' the vampire and pissing everyone off by trying to ... read morekill herself and get attention all the time. She then finds 'Jacob' the werewolf and falls for him but then he gives her the push and she sulks around over him and again tries to kill herself and get attention...this is not a good example to set for young teenage girls but I guess their mums are too busy watching the young topless boys on screen.

    The whole film is ridiculous and is almost soft silly MTV porn, the werewolf characters all walk around topless and in shorts all the time which is kinda odd. The wolf CGI looks OK fur wise but then you see their faces and mainly the eyes and it all falls apart. The ending set in Italy is a mess and I couldn't follow what the hell was suppose to be happening, and did I mention 'Bella' flirting with 'Edward' to 'Jacob' every other scene not knowing who she wants *yawn* you just wanna slap her.

    Its virtually the same as the first film but with werewolves, more naughty vamps trying to kill 'Cullen' and 'Bella' and a very predictable outcome. I haven't read the books but from other reviews I have read these films don't compare in anyway, shame is the first film was actually not bad as a teen angst vamp flick for the modern age, a kind of 'Lost Boys' crossed with 'Interview' but with a softer edge. This is just a preset, money spinning, CGI rushed 'Harry Potter' type franchise like everything in this day and age, no quality or actual decent acting, its just faceless pretty people who are ten a penny in most films these days and will vanish into obscurity in years to come. There is yet a third outing for this silliness to come despite the outcome of this film (they just love to whack out a preset trilogy for everything huh) and I will watch it simply for my love of anything to do with vamps and lycans, I know what I'm in for.
  • fb733768972
    November 17, 2012
    fb733768972
    This second instalment is a pretty terrible sequel, and does not live up to it's predecessor in any way whatsoever. The cinematography is still just as impressive, getting in quite a few intriguing shot positions, but that does not save this hopeless mess at all. It has many flaw... read mores, it is not as subtle as the first, the acting is brutally awful, the story is very thrown together, and the conclusion made me want more, but I didn't really care by that point. "New Moon" is extremely cliched with a few cool scenes to get the viewer by. This series is going down the drain, but I will keep giving them a chance to redeem themselves!
  • September 29, 2012
    I watched New Moon yesterday and overall I think it's pretty good. Some people are saying there wasn't enough action in it.. well people did you read the book? There wasn't much action in that either.

    The movie followed the book fairly well I thought. In fact overall, I was pret... read morety impressed with the movie. The wolves looked cool. I reckon the next movie will be great as it will have more action scenes in it with wolves fighting vampires and so forth.

    The acting wasn't so great. The person who played Jacob did a pretty good job, the person who played Laurent did a fairly good job and the person who played Bella did better than last time and was pretty good in this movie. However, the person who played Alice wasn't very spectacular and I don't think they played her character well and as usual I think Robert Pattison can't act.

    Other than that I loved the movie. If you can get past the dodgy acting it's good. If you liked the book of New Moon you should like the movie.
  • August 13, 2012
    It's a more impressive sequel than the original, but 'New Moon' fails to deliver a new dawn for the twilight series. Instead, stuck in first gear, the film coughs and wheezes along to its last breath, before the end credits roll.

    Painfully long for its subject matter and tone, t... read morehe acting abilities of Taylor Lautner must again be questioned. Does he have any beyond being a pretty face which the target audience, pre-pubscent girls can moon over? It seems not. Kristen Stewart in her main role as central character Bella Swan gives a better performance than her male counterpart Robert Pattison, who despite playing a cold, emotionless vampire, could try harder on the emotion front.

    The script and story are the worst however. As soon as it begins, the film begins to lose pace, right from the word go. A dull and depressingly long tale is explored through poor cinematography and visuals, spare a few moments. A tale, in which nothing really happens.

    It seems the film has been made as a placeholder between the first and the third, and because of this has suffered the tragedy of being a story without a plot.

    However, its saving grace is slightly good performances from a few loan faces in certain moments, and despite all the odds, the film is slightly better than its original predecessor.
  • May 14, 2012
    I wasn't a huge fan of the first film but I thought this one was going to have more of a Vampires vs. Werewolfs theme so I gave it a go. I was disappointed to say the least. Like I said in my review of the first film, I was never in the target audience but even then, I went throu... read moregh teenage angst and went through a 'Goth' stage, I had my heart broken etc etc, but this is depressing even by depressed 13 year old pubescent standards. I've never really got the romantic idea of Vampyrism either, cheer up you miserable buggers, you make hard-core trekkies look cool! Anyway, all that aside, this is a very dull film about a vacuous and particularly annoying girl that I didn't like very much. I really don't understand the fuss over Kristen Stewart, she's gormless personified!
  • fb100000716838411
    May 9, 2012
    fb100000716838411
    If you're a Twilight fan and you're reading this, I know what you're going to say:
    "Omg, your a hater! Quit being jealous!"
    Jealous of what? Nothing about this movie is good. The entire series as a whole just ruins the way we think of vampires. Seriously, what vampire spends his ... read moretime kissing some ugly, whiny chick rather than sucking her blood? Bela Lugosi is rolling in his grave because of Twilight. Watch the 1931 Dracula movie, it shows what a real vampire is like. If you prefer Twilight to the classic Dracula though, you might have something wrong with you. New moon takes forever for an evident storyline to ensue. Most of it is just Bella whining about how miserable her life is even though starving children in Africa still have no cure for the diseases they've caught. What happens when Edward leaves her? She whines more, then tries to kill herself. As you can tell, she's going to set back woman's rights by about 50 years. So after Jacob "Someone needs to staple a fucking shirt onto me" Black shows up, Bella gets all lovey dovey for him and then we have to sit through Bella making the biggest choice of all: Necrophelia or Beastiality? It's one of those things where you have to wonder how hard Stephenie Meyer was hit in the head while writing this shit. As if the boring plot and crappy dialogue wasn't enough, we have to watch these kids try to act even though I've seen kindergarten plays with better acting. See the face Taylor Lautner is making on the DVD cover? That's the face he makes for the enitre movie. They try and play him off as this tragic character fighting for love even though he's incredibly bland. See the face Kristen Stewart is making on the DVD cover? That's the face she makes her whole life. No emotion, just a dull stare from a dull actress. Not only does the series disgrace vampires, but it also disgraces werewolves. Jacob isn't even a werewolf. Werewolves transform at the full moon whether they like it or not, have no control over who they attack and actually scare people. Jacob has none of these qualities. His character puts more emphasis on taking his shirt off than actually being a wolf. What's Edward up to? He's going to give himself up to a group called the Volturi. They are lead by a guy named Aro, one of the worst villains ever. All he does is put his fingertips together and talk like he's trying to seduce whoever he engages in conversation. Come to think of it, Aro looks kind of like Loki from the Avengers, only Loki is more threatening, has more personality, potrayed by a better actor and doesn't look like he rolled around in a mountain of cocaine. As you can guess, Bella wants to save Edward and the predictability continues. But really, what's wrong with Edward? He doesn't want to hurt Bella at the beginning of the film, so he runs away and leaves her alone with wolf boy and her stereotype of a father? What a dick move. Leaving her is going to hurt more than you can even imagine. Stay with her and work things through like a couple. Quit being a baby, stop whining about how you're going to harm Bella and actually try to show you'll stick with her. Wow, you see what this movie has done to me. I'm giving romantic advice to a vampire. That should never happen. I should be running away from him whilst being terrified about my blood getting sucked out. Instead, I have to teach him how to be a boyfriend...fuck you Twilight.
  • February 20, 2012
    Cast: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner, Ashley Greene, Rachelle Lefevre, Billy Burke, Peter Facinelli, Nikki Reed, Kellan Lutz, Jackson Rathbone, Michael Sheen, Dakota Fanning, Edi Gathegi, Graham Greene, Elizabeth Reaser

    Director: Chris Weitz

    Summary: In... read more this sequel to Twilight directed by Chris Weitz (American Pie), Forks, Wash., resident Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) is reeling from the departure of her vampire love, Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson), and finds comfort in her friendship with Jacob Black, a werewolf (Taylor Lautner). But before she knows it, she's thrust into a centuries-old conflict, and her desire to be with Edward at any cost leads her to take greater and greater risks.

    My Thoughts: "I enjoyed this movie much better then "Twilight". I think Chris did a really good job with this movie at trying to keep it as close to the book as you possibly could. It is a rather slow burning film, but I didn't mind because so is the book. Chris also does a great job at bringing the wolves to life. Those who have read the book will enjoy it, those who haven't will probably think it's slow and mediocre. New Moon was one of the two favorites of mine of the series, so maybe that is why I liked it more."
  • February 7, 2012
    I did not find this particularly interesting.

Critic Reviews


Laremy Legel
May 6, 2011
Laremy Legel, Film.com

So long as there are people, there will be love stories -- I hope they all feel as lush and lively as this one. Full Review

Sara Vilkomerson
December 7, 2009
Sara Vilkomerson, New York Observer

I am not ashamed to admit that I will be the first in line for Twilight part three. Full Review

Louisa Thomas
November 24, 2009
Louisa Thomas, Newsweek

If only director Chris Weitz had managed to tease out the real drama -- Bella's fear of aging -- instead of a tired one. Full Review

Christopher Orr
November 24, 2009
Christopher Orr, The New Republic

A landmark cinematic event in 280 words, or one for every $500,000 of weekend box office. Full Review

A.O. Scott
November 23, 2009
A.O. Scott, At the Movies

It has an amazing kind of emotional integrity and intensity. Full Review

David Edelstein
November 23, 2009
David Edelstein, New York Magazine

Weitz's pacing is so limp you're going to need the electricity generated by a live audience to keep from yelling, "Hurry it up!" Full Review

Tom Long
November 20, 2009
Tom Long, Detroit News

A big bowl of adolescent romantic mush garnished with horror-lite action scenes and a rushed road trip, The Twilight Saga: New Moon is a mess. Full Review

Peter Rainer
November 20, 2009
Peter Rainer, Christian Science Monitor

Memo to director Chris Weitz and screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg: Just because you make a movie about vampires doesn't mean you suck the life out of your story. Full Review

Jessica Hopper
November 20, 2009
Jessica Hopper, Chicago Reader

The movie's script and production values represent a big step up from the nearly unwatchable predecessor and make it suitable viewing even for people who aren't Twilight nerds. Full Review

Anna Smith
November 20, 2009
Anna Smith, Time Out

'New Moon' is little more than a skilful soap opera, but it's still enjoyable escapism - even if you're old and wise enough to see through it. Full Review

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Twilight
    Twilight (96%)
  • The Twilight Saga: Eclipse
    The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (96%)
  • Twilight
    Twilight (82%)
  • Nosferatu: Phantom der Nacht (Nosferatu the Vampyre)
    Nosferatu: Phantom der Nacht (Nosferatu the V... (0%)

Facts


    • Caius: We do not offer second chances...
    • Edward Cullen: Leaving you was the hardest thing I've done in 100 years. I swear, I will never fail you again.
    • Emmett: Dating an older women? Hot.
    • Edward Cullen: Bella, will you marry me?
    • Bella Swan: Why didn't you let me speak to him!?
    • Jacob Black: He didn't ask for you.
    • Bella Swan: I don't care!
    • Alice: Bella, he's going to the Volturi. He wants to die too.
    • Jacob Black: You're such a hypocrite. What, I'm not the right kind of monster for you?

The Twilight Saga... : Watch Free on TV


The Twilight Saga: New Moon Trivia


  • "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" was filmed in Italy too.. where?  Answer »
  • In the twilight saga movies, new moon, what color is Jacob's wolf?  Answer »
  • Box Office of ____. Avatar ($749.8M) Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen ($402.1M) Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ($302M) The Twilight Saga: New Moon ($297M) Up ($293M)  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin