Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Celeste Russi, Jonathan Crosby, Amir Bar-Lev, Mark Olmstead, Laura Olmstead ... see more see more... , Marla Olmstead , Zane Olmstead , Anthony Brunelli , Stuart Simpson , Michael Kimmelman , Elizabeth Cohen , Ron Curtis Jr. , Jackie Wescott , Tara Sands

Most four-year-olds make paintings that hang on the refrigerator in their parents' kitchen, but by that age Marla Olmstead already had her first gallery show in Binghamton, NY. Born in 2000, Marla fir... read more read more...st picked up a paint brush when she was a year old, following the example of her father, an amateur painter, and soon the tyke was creating large canvases with unexpected skill and enthusiasm. Her father gave one of Marla's paintings to a friend who owned a coffee shop, and when a customer offered to buy the piece for 250 dollars, the pre-kindergartner began a career as a professional artist. Marla's work has been displayed around the United States and her paintings fetch as much as 25,000 dollars each, but some have questioned if Marla is following her own muse or taking instruction from her parents. Others have debated the validity of reviews comparing her work to Pablo Picasso and Jackson Pollock, and a few have asked if Marla's parents are the art world equivalent of stage mothers, pushing their child and exploiting her talents for their own benefit. Documentary filmmaker Amir Bar-Lev examines young artist, her work and the controversy behind it in his film My Kid Could Paint That, which was an official selection at the 2007 Sundance Film Festival. ~ Mark Deming, Rovi

Flixster Users

77% liked it

4,791 ratings

Critics

94% liked it

81 critics

PG-13, 1 hr. 23 min.

Directed by: Amir Bar-Lev

Release Date: October 5, 2007

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: March 4, 2008

Get It:

Stats: 832 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (832)


  • September 30, 2009
    Amir Bar-Lev strikes gold with this documentary. A very capable film maker gets his break when a twist in the story he is covering reveals a compelling mystery. This is a doc about so much more than a little girls paintings and its text book perfect film making!
  • August 10, 2009
    The parents tried to PROVE that they kid does its own drawnings...and even set up cameras, but you can see them showing her to paint here, paint there...I think this is a fraud. I also think abstract art is bs! Just watch and judge it yourself.
  • April 5, 2009
    Really good. There is a shift half way though the movie as the scandal breaks and the film maker needs to shift focus to what might be going on underneath it all.
    As I watch more and more docs I have noticed that there are not many that can tell the story objectively. This one ... read moreis the same as the director puts his struggle to try and stay objective into the film. Does he continue with the original premise of documenting a child painter or does he follow the path before him that could taint the story as a ruse?
    A well done film that lets you decide for yourself in the end with the facts laid out before you.
  • November 28, 2008
    This is an interesting documentary which raises some larger issues about the art world (second doc in a row I've watched about "art world" following Who the $##% is Jackson Pollock?). The director can be accused of not being direct enough in his final confrontation of the parents... read more.

    I find an interesting conclusion made from this film: if a kid is having fun painting while interacting with a parent, what bearing does or should any input have that the parent may give the kid? If you suggest what the kid should do without taking the brush out of their hand, does that mean it's no longer the child's work? What about the adult artist who takes in criticism from other artists while still working on a piece? Are all these people also entitled to authorship or a signature? I just think this film does not make specific what PART of the parents and Marla'a behavior makes the art "not hers". I *think* it's the fact that the director suspects that the Dad Mark may do physical touch-ups to the paintings with his own brush after hsi daughter finishes, but this point isn't made clear.

    This film also proves that art sales are all about marketing and media attention, especially for modern art, just as the gallery owner and seller for Marla's art will attest/protest.

    This is a nice "debunking of the prodigy" film, and it works that angle on many levels, none of which I think the child herself will find to be insulting in future reflection.

    Regardless of the movie's ambiguities, in five to ten years, any questions left in the air about Marla's talent will be solved by what she will do in her future art career.
  • August 1, 2008
    Interesting topic, let down by an uneven documentary.
  • July 31, 2008
    A very interesting film indeed. I particularly liked the discussion on the value of modern art etc. Some of the paintings were quite arresting no matter who painted them. My own opinion on the subject is that Marla is just a child who likes to paint in the usual child way, but wa... read mores picked up by the art community - and her father and the first art gallery owner went along with that popularity to live out their own dreams of making it big in the art world, as pretty much anyone who had been denied that kind of success would have. The joy of the film is that it allows the viewer to make up their own mind, despite some of the filmmaker's leanings.
  • July 30, 2008
    What could have been a mature and slightly satirical look into the world of modern art suddenly plunges into a deep dark mystery. The film casts so much doubt over who creates the paintings it seems obvious Marla did not do them herself. Even the families own evidence shows her c... read morereating a less affective piece. However there is a real family at the heart of this film, especially the mother who seems painfully honest. If it is lies then it is a shame for the young protagonist, who seems to just wanna have fun, even when showing up her father on screen. Amir Bar-Lev puts too much of himself into the film for a truly objective stance, however he is honest enough to admit he is emotionally invested in the film as well as keeping a line about how documentary film makers can create their own truth. Fascinating, bewildering and something that in ten years will hopefully have a follow-up.
  • June 3, 2008
    I have never in my life seen a documentary as magnificent as this - engrossing all the way through, paced meticulously, beautiful camerawork, insightful interviews, adorable children, breathtaking artwork. Amir Bar-Lev manages to capture footage of Marla that makes her look almos... read moret idiotic that the audience is supposed to question her capability of doing this. Bar Lev mostly keeps his opinions out of his documentary (as contrasted to the omnipresent Michael Moore...blegh) but the few times he actually steps into the camera and speaks it's always carefully introspective and highly respectful. He has grown to care about these people, particularly the mother, and I can feel his pain resonating through the camera when he was forced to perform the "confrontation". I want to keep my opinions out of this review but it's obvious the father doctored them up, probably without the knowledge of the mother. The reporter was kind of a bitch in the way she said things but she was the one that brought up the best points. But seriously, why the heck should it matter so much? The paintings are beautiful no matter who painted them, and I seriously want to buy a couple hundred and put them up in my house because of the sheer freedom and rapture they evoke. This was originally just supposed to be a documentary about modern art but it escalated rapidly into much more than that. It makes the documentary much more evocative but the director's hesitations are palpable...I empathize entirely. The modern art elegy could have been just as beautiful because I am in LOVE with those paintings.
  • January 15, 2008
    [CENTER][img]http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1803/marla2ik5.jpg[/img][/CENTER]

    [COLOR=DarkRed][FONT=Arial]My Kid Could Paint That - Prodigy, fraud, normal preschooler? This incisive and captivating documentary looks at a four-year-old who has made thousands of dollars on he... read morer modern art paintings. If she is the real deal, what does that say about modern art when a child can compete with serious artists? This intensely interesting story is given as objective a viewpoint as possible even as the filmmaker is forced into his own movie when the family he's been documenting is looking at his film as a favorable retort to a very critical 60 Minutes segment casting doubt that the paintings are genuine. The filmmaker has his own doubts and explores the nature of journalism and storytelling and objectivity and what is art, and that's when the documentary transcends its story and becomes about much more. I have no doubt that the child is involved in painting (the question registers with how involved her failed artist father is), but the people that are buying her paintings are buying them because they are also purchasing the story. [I]My Kid Could Paint That[/I], as one interview subject states, is really a story about adults seeking the limelight, because otherwise it would just be a kid having fun painting in the confines of her home. Is she exploited? Is she a genuine talent in a world of paint splashes and squiggly lines? Will she ever just be allowed to be a kid? These are just a few of the tantalizing questions this mature and insightful movie raises.

    Nate's Grade: B+


    The Namesake - Extremely heartfelt, this cross-generational family drama runs aground on some familiar territory but is boasted by strong acting. Whenever the film's focus falls to the arranged married couple settling into a new country and a new relationship, that is when [I]The Namesake[/I] is the most affecting and interesting. Too much time is spent on Gogol (Kal Penn) as their son who has completely embraced American culture and throws off his Indian roots. Of course he comes around in his opinion but his character never feels fully formed or completely believable, more like a composite of a prodigal son. Director Mira Nair has an obvious personal attachment to this tale of an Indian family trying to make their way in the U.S. of A, and she never misses her mark when dealing with the intensely decent and selfless father and his love for his wife. It's a shame then that the movie shifts too much focus at the halfway point onto Gogol. [I]The Namesake[/I] is a touching and entertaining that's a cut above thanks to sensitive performances.

    Nate's Grade: B+


    Kickin' It Old Skool - A moderately surprising comedy that's really much more fish-out-of--water than tired [I]You Got Served[/I] dance parody. Jamie Kennedy busts a move as a kid in a man's body who wakes up after being in a coma for 20 years. There is an overemphasis on recreating the 80s in the early part, with a crushing amount of catch phrases, name drops, and dated toys and fashions. The rest of the film follows the sports formula closely as Kennedy reassembles his aged Funky Fresh Boys to win a dance competition for standard goals like saving his family and winning the girl of his dreams. [I]Kickin' It[/I] is a simpleton comedy that never aims it sights too high, but every now and then the film connects on a gag or a character that produces some real yuks (my favorite being a homeless man convinced he invented break dancing). Some of the jokes are pretty dusty and the romance is, like most of the conflict, forced and contrived, and yet I cannot hate this movie. I never grew weary watching it even though during the climactic dance-off tournament there is a dearth of even attempted comedy.

    Nate's Grade: C


    A Mighty Heart - Good intentions and some proficient camerawork can only go so far to make a film worthwhile. Angelina Jolie gives the best performance of her career as kidnapped Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl's wife (she's French and Cuban, making for one really tricky accent). I wanted to like this movie more. The subject matter is serious and timely, the filmmaking has a sturdy docu-drama look, and the acting never comes across as phony, but alas, I think I mentally checked out because much of the film is a detective story that I already know the ending to. Daniel Pearl was infamously beheaded, so watching an hour of his wife, friends, and local police scramble to track down key figures, their allegiances and acquaintances, and the whereabouts of Daniels can come across as fruitless and somewhat cruel. This film doesn't have the same cathartic feel that [I]United 93[/I] had because that moment was universal, and while I can admire the cinematography and superb acting I can't ignore the fact that watching people search and fail gives me little emotional reward as a viewer.

    Nate's Grade: B


    Evening - A chick flick crammed with lots of bona fide stars and A-list talent that manages to squander all talent. It slogs on and on, the back and forth nature of the plot does little to keep an audience alert, and the story it tells in the past is so pedestrian, so miniscule, and ultimately so mundane that you can't help but wonder why an old woman on her deathbed would be flashing back and remembering it. This high profile weepy never finds the right tone and often settles for maudlin and predictable plot turns. [I]Evening[/I] is the kind of movie that kills the chances for a large, female-driven film to get made in Hollywood.

    Nate's Grade: C-[/FONT][/COLOR]
  • November 26, 2008
    [font=Century Gothic]"My Kid Could Paint That" is an inadequate documentary about 4-year old Marla Olmstead of Binghamton, New York whose painting was displayed at a local bar which led to an article in a local newspaper which led to an article in the New York Times which led to ... read moremany more paintings of hers being sold which should be a nice downpayment on any future psychiatric treatment. The fact that things got so far is mind-boggling, especially considering it is very hard to determine the effects of these events on Marla and her younger brother with the half-life of celebrity being impossible to calculate. Everbody might have been better off with this stopping with just the one painting and the parents having a good laugh. However, director Amir Bar-Lev is so coopted by his subjects that he does not ask the tough questions that he should be asking until it is much too late. The only people interviewed aside from the New York Times writer are people who have a vested interest in Marla's paintings. I was surprised that all of them were shocked by a "60 Minutes" expose that was very critical of the entire situation and brought up the question of whether Marla really did do all of the painting. It is irrelevant of course because a painting should be appreciated on its merits, no matter the age of the artist. As I have said before, an artist creates art for himself most of all and by creating abstract art is rebelling against realism.[/font]

Critic Reviews


Mark Bourne
March 11, 2008
Mark Bourne, Film.com

New York Times senior art critic Michael Kimmelman offers sharp insights when he mentions how Marla's painting reflects not just 'innocence' and what our psyches project into them, but also 'the cynic... Full Review

John Monaghan
November 2, 2007
John Monaghan, Detroit Free Press

More than a standard child prodigy profile, My Kid Could Paint That turns into a priceless examination of modern art, celebrity and what it means to be a kid. Full Review

J. R. Jones
November 2, 2007
J. R. Jones, Chicago Reader

The self-reflexive narrative is particularly fascinating because Marla's story is so critical to selling her art; everyone involved, the filmmaker included, has a vested interest in proving it genuine... Full Review

Steven Rea
November 2, 2007
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer

It's a thought-provoking look at the world of abstract art, the relationship between a reporter and his/her subject, and the nature of parenting, prodigies, and "objective" storytelling. Full Review

Richard Nilsen
November 1, 2007
Richard Nilsen, Arizona Republic

Documentarian Amir Bar-Lev began making a film about whether Modern art is a scam and whether a 4-year-old painter from Binghampton, N.Y., might not be as good as Picasso. But Bar-Lev ended making a f... Full Review

Roger Moore
November 1, 2007
Roger Moore, Orlando Sentinel

My Kid Could Paint That is a documentary that brings to the fore questions of youth exploitation, celebrity culture, the "con game" that is modern art and media's role in the whole tangled mess. Full Review

Susan Walker
October 19, 2007
Susan Walker, Toronto Star

Bar-Lev has made a refreshingly honest documentary. Full Review

Bruce Westbrook
October 19, 2007
Bruce Westbrook, Houston Chronicle

A fascinating documentary. Full Review

Roger Ebert
October 19, 2007
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

The truth lurking beneath My Kid Could Paint That is that your kid couldn't paint that. Full Review

Michael Phillips
October 18, 2007
Michael Phillips, Chicago Tribune

I've seen the film twice. It is a wonder, marked by a sense of wondrous skepticism that has nothing to do with cynicism. Full Review

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Exit Through The Gift Shop
    Exit Through The Gift Shop (100%)
  • Who the $#%@ Is Jackson Pollock
    Who the $#%@ Is Jackson Pollock (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

My Kid Could Pain... : Watch Free on TV


Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for My Kid Could Paint That. Want to create one?

Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?