Michael Reviews and Ratings


  • fb713014601
    May 29, 2012
    fb713014601
    Difficult subject, Schleinzer handles it well and delivers like early Haneke.
  • RadarHead
    May 24, 2012
    RadarHead
    Deeply disturbing. Due for the most part, to just how hard it works to maintain its objectivity. To look at the humanity pertaining to one of humanity's darkest corners - without flinching.
  • summerroyale
    February 8, 2012
    summerroyale
    can't wait. love twisted movies
  • BabyPeach84
    February 8, 2012
    BabyPeach84
    Well, someone certainly listened to my prayers...!! Seems to be a tense portrait and study of a "monster".
  • booklover11
    November 20, 2011
    booklover11
    Will probably be reviewed really well.
  • danieljparsons
    October 31, 2011
    danieljparsons
    Michael is a disturbing but quiet, largely evasive drama involving Michael - a man with a regular job who "keeps to himself", and whom hides in the specially locked and separately wired basement of his house a 10 year-old boy; Michael is a paedophile. The film shows Michae... read morel going about his day-to-day life for five months. He's a fairly private man, by necessity of course, though not without a social life. But in general, he goes to work, comes home, has dinner. Often, we see him interacting with the boy in his basement - giving him chores (the basement is an effect a miniature apartment - outfitted with it's own kitchenette and toilet), reading to him, sharing with him a meal. Aside from one moment of nudity, no sex is shown and is barely implied. The film doesn't try to show horrific abuse, though at the same time it's clear that the boy loathes Michael (there's no Stockholm Syndrome here). The boy has been lied to about his circumstances (we never see how he got there, or if his family are searching for him) but is intelligent enough to realise that he is being manipulated. The film takes a massive shift in the last 20 minutes with an unbearably tense final, prolonged sequence, and director Markus Schleinzer cleverly heightens the tension merely by showing people walking through rooms. The ending is incredibly courageous, refusing to offer any closure, answers, sense of justice or injustice, and provoked a very split reaction in the screening I saw (I was very much reminded of the reaction to the ending of Meek's Cutoff, with which Michael shares a similar detached - but not clinical - tone). However, the main problem I have is one of point. Why does the film exist? What is it trying to say? How am I supposed to feel? For many this was one of the film's virtues and indeed it's refreshing for a film - particular one with this kind of subject matter - to not entertain any usual conventions. The one thing it does show is that even though Michael is a monster, he still has a family that cares for him and whom presumably will have much to "deal" with after the film ends - unusually it will be them you are thinking of, not Michael, not the boy. But for much of the running time I wondered why I was watching it. Not that I was bored, that wouldn't be true - it's very, very well acted, interestingly filmed and edited, and quite gripping. But there just didn't seem to be much reason for the film to exist.
  • kurosawian
    October 14, 2011
    kurosawian
    This accomplished and daring film is masterfully made. It naturally evokes Haneke as well as Bresson. It's non-exploitative and remarkable non-judgmental. The story unfolds with clinical precision and the shots are frighteningly accurate. This is an important film made at the rig... read moreht time. The performances are impeccable and the film takes its time. We're left gasping and most importantly of all, discussing, long after the film is over.

Summary

Michael Summary