Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Naseeruddin Shah, Mahi Gill, Purav Bhandare, Sabyasachi Chakraborty, Irawati Harshe Mayadev ... see more see more... , Michael Fuith , David Rauchenberger , Christine Kain , Viktor Tremmel , Ursula Strauss , Xaver Winkler , Gisella Salcher , Simon Jaritz , Florian Eisner , Margot Vuga

Michael (Michael Fuith), a seemingly meek insurance agent, has a secret: he's holding 10-year-old Wolfgang (David Rauchenberger) captive in a locked room in his basement. Chronicling a five month peri... read more read more...od, director Markus Schleinzer reveals a tense portrait of how seemingly mundane lives can hide the darkest secrets. Michael is a masterfully executed study of a monster with rich cinematic detail and unnerving insight. -- (C) Strand

Flixster Users

80% liked it

1,440 ratings

Critics

79% liked it

34 critics

Unrated, 1 hr. 38 min.

Directed by: Markus Schleinzer

Release Date: February 15, 2012

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: May 15, 2012

Stats: 47 reviews

Photos


None yet... Got one?

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (47)


  • fb1364753347
    May 26, 2012
    fb1364753347
    The premise for this film is more fascinating than the film itself. It is well directed and really well acted but it delves no deeper than the shallow end in any of the characters or themes. Everytime you think the film will take a dive in the deep end, it quickly paddles back to... read more the simple idea of the guy with a kid in the basement. The premise is such a complex issue but there is no exploration, just bland presentation. Because of this the minimalist, realist style does not work because the beauty of minimalism is that while you are watching a scene that raises subtle themes your brain is de-constructing the themes from the previous scene, but here I there is nothing to think about because it all surface deep, which makes some of the banality just so dull, especially the final 10 minutes.
  • October 31, 2011
    Michael is a disturbing but quiet, largely evasive drama involving Michael - a man with a regular job who "keeps to himself", and whom hides in the specially locked and separately wired basement of his house a 10 year-old boy; Michael is a paedophile. The film shows Michae... read morel going about his day-to-day life for five months. He's a fairly private man, by necessity of course, though not without a social life. But in general, he goes to work, comes home, has dinner. Often, we see him interacting with the boy in his basement - giving him chores (the basement is an effect a miniature apartment - outfitted with it's own kitchenette and toilet), reading to him, sharing with him a meal. Aside from one moment of nudity, no sex is shown and is barely implied. The film doesn't try to show horrific abuse, though at the same time it's clear that the boy loathes Michael (there's no Stockholm Syndrome here). The boy has been lied to about his circumstances (we never see how he got there, or if his family are searching for him) but is intelligent enough to realise that he is being manipulated. The film takes a massive shift in the last 20 minutes with an unbearably tense final, prolonged sequence, and director Markus Schleinzer cleverly heightens the tension merely by showing people walking through rooms. The ending is incredibly courageous, refusing to offer any closure, answers, sense of justice or injustice, and provoked a very split reaction in the screening I saw (I was very much reminded of the reaction to the ending of Meek's Cutoff, with which Michael shares a similar detached - but not clinical - tone). However, the main problem I have is one of point. Why does the film exist? What is it trying to say? How am I supposed to feel? For many this was one of the film's virtues and indeed it's refreshing for a film - particular one with this kind of subject matter - to not entertain any usual conventions. The one thing it does show is that even though Michael is a monster, he still has a family that cares for him and whom presumably will have much to "deal" with after the film ends - unusually it will be them you are thinking of, not Michael, not the boy. But for much of the running time I wondered why I was watching it. Not that I was bored, that wouldn't be true - it's very, very well acted, interestingly filmed and edited, and quite gripping. But there just didn't seem to be much reason for the film to exist.

Critic Reviews


Mark Jenkins
February 16, 2012
Mark Jenkins, NPR

Like its protagonist, Michael is deliberate and very discreet. It shocks by suggestion, not by display. Full Review

Mark Olsen
February 16, 2012
Mark Olsen, Los Angeles Times

A hermetically sealed creep-fest that seems to have no desire to be anything more than just that. Full Review

V.A. Musetto
February 15, 2012
V.A. Musetto, New York Post

A well-acted, otherwise tightly scripted movie that builds suspense with a series of unexpected twists and turns. Full Review

Stephen Holden
February 14, 2012
Stephen Holden, New York Times

This coldly compelling film doesn't try to explain Michael's behavior or analyze his disease. As if doing penance for Michael's sins, it eventually metes out unequivocal punishment, but it is small co... Full Review

Nick Pinkerton
February 14, 2012
Nick Pinkerton, Village Voice

Schleinzer approaches his subject not as an investigator, but as though covering up a crime scene and scrubbing it of anything that might provide insight or empathy or psychological traction. Full Review

Alissa Simon
September 9, 2011
Alissa Simon, Variety

Illustrating the banality of evil in an impressively controlled and sometimes darkly humorous fashion, Michael takes a coolly nonjudgmental, non-psychological approach to a disturbing topic. Full Review

Liam Lacey
September 8, 2011
Liam Lacey, Globe and Mail

Dreadful as the subject matter is, the authenticity of the performances and the skill of Schleinzer's filmmaking are difficult to deny in this portrait of a monster as the bland guy next door. Full Review

Tom Keogh
May 10, 2012
Tom Keogh, Seattle Times

A strange and agonizingly engrossing drama despite its repellent subject. Full Review

Donald Clarke
March 19, 2012
Donald Clarke, Irish Times

Michael does have undeniable moral purpose. It forces us to ponder the way society chooses - another easy option - to comfortingly reclassify such perpetrators as monsters. Full Review

Tim Brayton
March 12, 2012
Tim Brayton, Antagony & Ecstasy

Haneke without the soul, and if you've seen enough of that man's pictures, you can maybe perceive how unsettling the idea of a soulless Haneke sounds. Full Review

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • The Snowtown Murders
    The Snowtown Murders (96%)
  • Funny Games
    Funny Games (100%)
  • One Hour Photo
    One Hour Photo (50%)
  • The Woodsman
    The Woodsman (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Michael : Watch Free on TV


Michael Trivia


  • Michael Keaton change his legal name because another actor had the same last name as he did .What actor had this name ?  Answer »
  • There is another actor whose real name is Michael Douglas, besides Kirk's son. What is his stage name?  Answer »
  • What actor was born Michael John Douglas and changed his name to prevent confusion with the already well known actor?  Answer »
  • What are the names of the children of Vito Corleone in the movie The Godfather? (Including the boy who was 'adopted' into the Corleone family and later became the family advisor)  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Michael. Want to create one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?