King Kong vs. Godzilla (1962)

• 
  
  December 27, 2011

  fb100002384654145

  Saw the American version, which had American-added news footage that constantly interrupted the flow of the movie. I'll wait until I see the original Japanese version to give my full review and true rating.

  Share This Review
• 
  
  August 12, 2010

  kiriyamakazou

  First of all, I saw the wonderful Japanese version. Second, Godzilla NEVER EVER EVER WON, nor was he meant to. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar and a whore. Anyway, the film itself! It's a great satire/comedy, which is what the producers were aiming for. The first two God... read morezilla films were straight horror, dealing with man's manipulation of nature. King Kong is a brilliant foe for Godzilla as he IS nature. He wasn't enhanced by radiation, but he was also abused by man. So now we have man's destructive capabilities and exploitation of nature, as well as the creatures they have created. At the core of this film is a TV studio executive trying to boost ratings for a science show. We get a lot of talk about "sponsors" and the "business" before it was cool. There are a few technical difficulties with this film. Their are some very poor edits, as a single shot will cut to a different take and carry on as if nothing happened. The costumes are also of lesser quality, though some exaggerations were made for comical effect. I have many favorite moments in this film. The main one being the first confrontation between Kong and 'Zilla. They square off, beating their chests, throwing rocks, and then...they simply walk away. Backing down as Godzilla shows off his fire breath and has the upper-ground. The final battle is weird and slapstick, and has Kong resurrected by lightning hands and then gaining lightning powers ?!?! This is very enjoyable, camp stuff. You must be willing to see these monsters in a comical light, and to have some lighthearted fun.

  Share This Review
• 
  
  September 10, 2009

  stormyweather980

  "King Kong vs. Godzilla" is the first of the classic King Kong vs. so and so movies that I saw. Japanese people are terrified because Godzilla is on the loose and he is supposedly headed toward Japan. But little do they know that King Kong will soon show up to give them double tr... read moreouble. But is King Kong that bad of an enemy? It's hard to say after he saves some people from a giant octopus. King Kong is smart and also very large and strong and Godzilla is not so smart and also large and strong, but he also has the ability to breathe fire. Who will win the fight?
  This movie was made in the early 60s so of course the special effects weren't as great as they are today and yes you can easily tell that the monsters are fake, but that doesn't take anything away from "King Kong vs. Godzilla" at all! I liked the movies "King Kong" and "Godzilla," but in my opinion, the classic movies where King Kong fights another huge creature are a lot more entertaining and more fun to watch.
  
  If you like the classic duels that involve King Kong, I definitely recommend getting "King Kong vs. Godzilla." It's one of those movies that are fun to watch over and over again throughout the years that will never get old. NOTE: That was my Amazon review from the year 2001.

  Share This Review
• 
  
  March 7, 2012

  crossbladezero

  It's the ultimate, fan-dreamed, hardcore thrill ride of a booming action extravaganza... by 1962 standards. Actually, I don't even know if I can say that, because this seems pretty underwhelming on that level, but hey, it's not like that's a terrible disappointment now-a-days, be... read morecause, more than the classic Kong and Zilla going head-to-head, we're chomping at the bit for a new, fresher duel between the King of Monsters and the King of Kongs. Actually, for me, I'm more along the lines excited for a duel between Pete Jackson and Roland Emmerich, and I don't mean directorially, I mean I want them to actually duke it out, and I mainly want that, because it's high time someone knocked him around a bit. I didn't identify which one I way referring to when I said "him", because I think they both need their battle scars, yet for different reasons: Roland Emmerich for being such an idiot and Pete Jackson for "Heavenly Creatures". Well, he did do "The Lord of the Rings" movies after that, so I suppose he's forever forgiven, but as we saw with his second "Post-Ring" film, "The Lovely Bones", anything either pertaining to Heaven or just having "Heaven" in the title probably isn't his strong suit. Hey, it least "The Lovely Bones" was better and more subtle than this little number I assure you that I'm about to talk about. Now, I know it's hard to figure out exactly how I feel about this film from that, seeing as I still kind of liked "Bones", but make no "Bones" about it; this film is messier than that and, well, plenty of films, which isn't to say that it still doesn't have some strengths to it.
  
  If anything can be said about this film that's not simply consistently good, but consistently great, it's the score. Granted, by consistently great, I don't mean that the score is constantly active, because it only comes in goes, yet when it does hit the scene - and always at the right places -, it's phenomenal, pumping the film with that feeling of scope and thrill. That certainly comes into play phenomenally during the action sequences, which aren't constantly excellent, as I'll get into later, but they have plenty of moments, and those moments often come at the moments where the special effects are relatively sharp. Moments like those are fun, if not just plain exciting, yet, even if this film didn't have those moments, it would still never be fully bad, because even with its missteps, it's careful to keep its head above water by keeping a consistent atmosphere of some degree of intrigue. However, while that intrigue does save the film, at the same time, it's why the film is so mediocre, for the film never transcends that straight aura. There's no rise or fall to the film; just a constant flow that's never really that impacting in the first place, resulting in what is, as I said, on paper, an ultimate, fan-dreamed, hardcore thrill ride of a booming action extravaganza, yet one executed so underwhelmingly and forgettably. Of course, the lack of oomph isn't the only thing keeping this film down.
  
  I don't know if it's because of the messy storytelling or just the fact that this film it's just too blasted Japanese for me, but eitherway, the "story" aspects - such as they are - are a touch confusing and make matters worse by doing little to build resonance. Yeah, I know it's all about as giant ape fighting a giant lizard, so we shouldn't expect the original "Cloverfield", in terms of top-notch pathos in the midst of all the awesome monster action, but at least give us some investment in the characters, especially if you're going to make the "story" aspects so slow. Okay, it's not a terribly dull film, yet it is dry in atmosphere and slow in pacing when there's no monster-head-bustery going on, making it often disengaging, convoluted and generally unrewarding. However, when there is some monster-head-bustery going on, regardless of the bright spots, most of this action stands to be more intense and less repetitive, and I would say that I understand why the action is mostly underwhelming, seeing as how they're working with a disaster-action epic held down by the limitations of the '60s, yet this time, I can't even give them that benefit of the doubt, because the technical value isn't all that impressive by its own standards. Okay, again, there are a fair amount of pretty shiny bright spots, but on the whole, seams are clear as day, and not just in the visual effects, but the practical effects, such as the monster costumes that aren't abysmal, but lack soul and presence. There's very little consequence and intrigue to make up for the limited dazzle in all of these action sequences, leaving a film that should be defined for awesome action to not even deliver on consistently well-produced action, let alone unique action. Now, again, the film is hardly ever bad, yet it's just as rarely upstanding, being so run-of-the-mill as a creature feature of this type, yet still almost too boastful of its intentions as that big confrontation between two huge - so to speak - icons, leaving the film to write plenty of checks that it delivers on in such a half-baked fashion that it is ultimately rendered utterly forgettable.
  
  At the end of the brawl, the film never slips into the state of being bad, partially thanks to some decent bright spots in action and special effects, as well as a constantly glowing score to keep your eyes and ears glued to the screen, yet on the whole, it's dry and slow outside of the heat of battle and somewhat underwhelmingly-produced when claws and paws go flying, ultimately leaving "King Kong vs. Godzilla" to stumble through the ring, watchable enough for it to keep from collapsing, yet still too mediocre to deliver on genuine thrills or anything worth remembering.
  
  2/5 - Mediocre

  Share This Review
• 
  
  December 19, 2011

  staindslaved

  King Kong gets superpowered on electricity? Hum...I must have missed that part in the original. Kong would probably win a popularity contest but an actual fight with Godzilla? Very doubtful. So they super charge him with nothing short of freaking lightning and he's able to fen... read mored off the monster. What complete garbage. This film is nothing but a gimmick and not worth your time.

  Share This Review
• 
  
  January 17, 2008

  cacutshaw

  The Japanese version is better, in fact it was kind of ahead of it's time in terms of media and advertisers being parodied, but the American version is still good, dumb fun.

  Share This Review
• 
  
  May 24, 2007

  threefolddado

  I prefer the Japanese version where Godzilla wins.

  Share This Review
• 
  
  January 4, 2012

  bobbydiablo

  The hardest part about watching the American version is the ping pong news commentator match in the beginning. This is just a straight-up first ever "What if" so-so fought whats-his-name flick, the last installment the Aliens VS Predators films. Some re-telling of the King Kong s... read moretory with Japanese actors in black face playing presumably African natives of Skull Island, the film turns into a full on Saturday night popcorn wrestling match as the 2 cinematic titans use Japan as a boxing ring.

  Share This Review
• 
  
  October 8, 2010

  themasterpiece69

  This movie is so-so.The only good part about the movie is the second battle between King Kong and Godzilla.

  Share This Review
• 
  
  November 25, 2009

  donaldwhite1

  I remember when I was a kid and every summer a Godzilla vs. Somebody movie came out. This was the first one. They showed them at the little theater in Perry, Oklahoma but I never went to see any of them. After seeing this movie I see why. I was a smarter kid than I thought. ... read moreThis is the ugliest King Kong I ever saw. The story was silly. The Japanese actors were silly and the American narrators were pointless. Most of the movie was spent getting King Kong and Godzilla in the same place. They fight for a few minutes then fall into the ocean. King Kong swims away and Godzilla vanishes. The whole thing was more of a live action cartoon. It was guys in rubber monster suits wrestling and trashing miniatures for no reason. Maybe I would have enjoyed it when I was six or seven. My friends at school seemed to have, it just didn't occur to me back then to ask my parents to take me. By the time I was aware of Godzilla they were promoting "Godzilla vs. The Thing" and "Godzilla vs. It".

  Share This Review

• Michael Keith as Eric Carter
• James Yagi as Yataka Omura
• Tadao Takashima as O. Sakurai
• Mie Hama as Fumiko Sakurai
• Yu Fujiki as Kinsaburo Farue man with corns
• Kenji Sahara as Kazoo Fujito
• Ichiro Arishima as Mr. Tako
• Akihiko Hirata as Premier Shigezawa
• Akiko Wakabayashi as Tamiye

Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

• 
  Transformers (54%)
• 
  Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man (100%)
• 
  Furankenshutain no kaijû: Sanda tai Gaira (Th... (100%)
• 
  Godzilla vs. Mothra (Mosura tai Gojira) (100%)

No facts approved yet. Be the first

• In King Kong vs Godzilla, who won?  Answer »
• In the 1963 film King Kong VS Godzilla who directed it?  Answer »
• In the 1963 movie King Kong VS Godzilla who directed it?  Answer »
• Tom Hanks Movie? King Kong vs. Godzilla  Answer »

No quizzes for King Kong vs. Godzilla. Want to create one?

No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

• donaldwhite1
• mikeferatu
• browneyes234
• traceyhope7
• naashomwhe...
• blackwulfe666
• hellishcro...
• greatguy19...

No recent headlines. Got one?

• 

  1960s Sci-fi

  by lablav
  60 Movies
• 

  FILMS - Monkey Magic

  by SirPant
  82 Movies
• 

  want to see

  by lesliepeterson
  488 Movies
• 

  Movies Watched

  by hark777
  35 Movies
• 

  1960s

  by BrotherReed
  37 Movies