Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Laurence Olivier, Robert Newton, Renée Ashershon, Esmond Knight, Leslie Banks ... see more see more... , Leo Genn , Felix Aylmer , Janet Burnell , Valentine Dyall , Gerald Case , Roy Emerton , Jonathan Field , Frederick Cooper , Morland Graham , Vernon Greeves , Arthur Hambling , Jimmy Hanley , Nicholas Hannen , George Cole , Robert Helpmann , Freda Jackson , Griffith Jones , John Laurie , Francis Lister , Niall MacGinnis , Brian Nissen , George Robey , Michael Shepley , Ernst Thesiger , Russell Thorndike , Frank Tickle , Ralph Truman , Harcourt Williams , Max Adrian , Ken Richmond , Ivy St. Helier

Laurence Olivier's adaptation of Henry V is one of the finest Shakespeare films ever made, full of rousing action, beautiful colors, and passionate performances. Henry V is the story of the newly crow... read more read more...ned king of England, who fights the French for possession of Normandy. Olivier's direction is inventive, beginning the film as if it were a performance at the Globe Theatre, and having it slowly expand so the final battle scenes take place in realistic settings. Released in 1944 during the height of World War II, Henry V didn't receive an American release until 1946, upon which Olivier won a special Academy Award for "his outstanding achievement as actor, producer and director in bringing Henry V to the screen." ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine, Rovi

Flixster Users

73% liked it

3,806 ratings

Critics

100% liked it

22 critics

Unrated, 2 hr. 16 min.

Directed by: Laurence Olivier

Release Date: June 17, 1946

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: June 22, 1999

Get It:

Stats: 171 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (171)


  • October 9, 2007
    Not at all what I expected. The use to the theater stage and "Mr. Roger's Neighborhood"-esque production design in fascinating.

    Can defiantly see it's influence on Wes Anderson and Monty Python.
  • March 30, 2012
    "I am Henry V; I am Henry V; I am, I am!" No, wait, that's Henry VII... or IV, or VI or IX or CCLXXXII. Man, there were too many King Henrys (Though still not as many George Foremans), so one can only imagine how many adaptations they've made of the Shakespeare plays. ...Oh wait,... read more there have only been two, and they were both done by pretty much the same person. Oh, Kenneth Branagh, he is Olivier II; he is Olivier II; he is, he is! Really, that would probably make him, like, Shakespeare XIII or something, because he and Olivier both might have been some kind of relative to that ye olde earring-wearing sonneth of a gunneth (Well, to be fair, as old as Olivier was, he might have actually been Shakespeare's kid, or more likely, Grandfather), seeing as they pretty much built their careers around those plays, too. Okay, Branagh is and Oliver was still very versatile if the film industry, yet I can see why we keep associating Shakespeare with the two filmmakers, because Shakespeare is - or was, in the case of the late, great Sir Olivier - they're game, and sure enough, Olivier played that game pretty well with, well, another film, I'm sure, because while this film is enjoyable, it goes plagued by its own ambitions, among other things.

    I went into this film totally unaware of its cleverly original and unique concept of dramatising an actual performance of the play in Shakespeare's Globe Theatre in 1600 before we fade into the the actual film adaptation of the play as though it was seen through the visualisations of Globe Theatre audience members. Again, it's a very refreshing concept and one that I could really get behind, were it not for the fact that it's almost a whole 30 paceless minutes into the film before we finally fade out of the Globe Theatre. Once the transition is made, the tone is shifted jarringly and it takes a while for you to get used to the transportation, even though you never really got used to the Globe Theatre segment of the film, seeing as its mixture of stage play and period film - a potentially brilliant gimmick - is absurdly overlong, jarring and ultimately leaves you to become disengaged very frequently. After you finally fall into the world of Henry V, the sailing may be much smoother, but there are still some rocky tides forged by Laurence Olivier still pumping the film with a sometimes overbearing theatrical tone that may not be as severe as it was when were seeing the actual play, but still doesn't always fit the tone, leaving our investment in the film, as a film, to go diluted. The film is an absolute mess, not merely tainted by missteps in storytelling, but missteps in ambition, as this film talks a big game, but in the long run, it doesn't deliver on everything it sets out to accomplish. However, within the ambition lays something that truly plays a large part in saving this mess of a project, almost to the point of raising it well above average: Charm. The film's intentions are noble, yet mostly unfulfilled, but where plenty of films of this type would worsen their state by drenching their ambitions in pretense, Olivier approaches the project with hight spirits and charisma, both on and off of the screen, and the film truly benefits from that, as well as certain areas of ambition that this film really does deliver on, and pretty sharply at that.

    Bypassing filming limitations of the '40s to produce scope, dazzle and sweep that rivals even today's examples of quality cinematography was a possible feat that only so many could accomplish, and Jack Hildyard and Robert Krasker were among those handful of visionary cinematographers. The coloring and lighting of the film is plagued by the test of time, yet it's still so flashy and lively, attracting your eyes on many an occasion, particularly those phenomenal moments of truly incredible camerawork, from sweeps and dives in the midst of action or simply a slow, steady and meditative hovering observation of the immersively stellar production designs. Another aspect that saves the film is that it is simply a film about a Shakespeare play, and the guy really knew how to produce a worthy story with scope and uniqueness, and while Olivier doesn't do this classic total justice, his production of the film and the way he portrays it make the final product, if nothing else, consistently entertaining. That entertainment value is certainly amerliorated by charm, not just the direction, but in the performance, because although several performances have dated, and were already tainted by 1600s theatrics to begin with, most everyone brings charisma to the screen, particularly Laurence Olivier himself. Okay, now, Olivier's acting isn't one to evoke "Citizen Kane" or anything, but hey, at least it's better than his direction. No, again, his direction is workmanlike, yet his performance, while not incredibly impressive, is still strong enough for him to carry this product more than he ever does behind the camera. Olivier portrays King Henry V with charm, brilliance and powerful authority, yet some degree of vulnerability and humanity, and it's all brought together by a strong presence that results in a strong lead performance that keeps you charmed and sometimes even compelled.

    As the curtains draw, it's easy to walk away rather dissatisfied by the jarring thematic shifts and overlong segments, all of which go plagued by an often overbearing theatrical tone that only dilutes intrigue and investment, yet you're kept from completely falling out of the film by the remarkable cinematography and productions designs, as well as much atmospheric and acting charm, with Laurence Olivier's assured lead acting performance all but making up for his missteps as director and making his vision of "Henry V" a generally entertaining production, flawed though, it may be.

    2.5/5 - Fair
  • December 16, 2009
    Olivier,the brave little toaster.Megalomaniac beyond good and evil,a person who pushed Shakespeare to the limits,and in his personal Henry V vision tarnishes the philosophy of the play.He probably knows we're in the movies so in spite of the rejuvenating colors and the chirping a... read moretmosphere,we are aware of the Shakespearean pathos somewhere in that clamor of fight.
  • June 3, 2010
    A pretty ambitious production by Olivier, certainly helped explain some parts I missed of "Chimes at Midnight". Get over the propaganda.
  • November 23, 2007
    Many scenes have a wonderful sense that the viewer is in a medieval 'book of hours' and I love how the film starts and ends with being in the Globe Theatre in Shakespeare's time.
  • October 31, 2006
    maybe it was the first to be truly amazing, but time has made it extremely dull. half the movie a play, the other half real life??? ending back to a play??

Critic Reviews


Jonathan Rosenbaum
July 9, 2008
Jonathan Rosenbaum, Chicago Reader

One can pick plenty of bones with Laurence Olivier's direction of the Shakespeare play, but this 1945 film is still a powerful production from many standpoints. Full Review

Variety Staff
July 9, 2008
Variety Staff, Variety

The color, the sets, the expanse and the imaginative quality of the filming are unexcelled. Full Review

Bosley Crowther
August 13, 2003
Bosley Crowther, New York Times

A stunningly brilliant and intriguing screen spectacle, rich in theatrical invention, in heroic imagery and also gracefully regardful of the conventions of the Elizabethan stage. Full Review

Judy Stone
January 1, 2000
Judy Stone, San Francisco Chronicle

Henry V was Olivier's first Shakespearean film, and he directed it with brilliant imagination and elegance. Full Review

Emanuel Levy
March 24, 2009
Emanuel Levy, EmanuelLevy.Com

Experimental in its approach to adapating Shakespeare to the big screen, Laurence Olivier's film is an innovative, stunningly looking, well-acted work. Full Review

Steve Crum
March 2, 2008
Steve Crum, Video-Reviewmaster.com

Great Olivier performance and direction.

Derek Malcolm
August 10, 2007
Derek Malcolm, This is London

Olivier's terrific performance and William Walton's sweeping score render it one of the best Shakespeare films ever made. Full Review

Peter Bradshaw
August 10, 2007
Peter Bradshaw, Guardian [UK]

A bold, clear reading of Shakespeare's play and an exhilarating piece of wartime propaganda. Full Review

August 10, 2007
Total Film

The dashing Olivier gives an exceptional performance, whether galvanizing his troops with his soaring oratory, or realizing on the eve of combat the king's profound isolation. Full Review

David Parkinson
August 10, 2007
David Parkinson, Empire Magazine

A towering performance from Olivier cements this as a true example of flag-waving cinema. Full Review

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • As You Like It
    As You Like It (100%)
  • The Magic Flute
    The Magic Flute (0%)
  • Richard III
    Richard III (100%)
  • Campanadas a medianoche (Chimes at Midnight) (Falstaff)
    Campanadas a medianoche (Chimes at Midnight) ... (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Henry V (The Chro... : Watch Free on TV


Henry V (The Chronicle History of King Henry the Fift with His Battell Fought at Agincourt in France Trivia

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Henry V (The Chronicle History of King Henry the Fift with His Battell Fought at Agincourt in France. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?