Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Colin Clive, Boris Karloff, Mae Clarke, John Boles, Dwight Frye ... see more see more... , Edward Van Sloan , Frederick Kerr , Lionel Belmore , Arletta Duncan , Marilyn Harris , Michael Mark , Pauline Moore , Francis Ford

Still regarded as the definitive film version of Mary Shelley's classic tale of tragedy and horror, Frankenstein made unknown character actor Boris Karloff a star and created a new icon of terror. Alo... read more read more...ng with the highly successful Dracula, released earlier the same year, it launched Universal Studio's golden age of 1930s horror movies. The film's greatness stems less from its script than from the stark but moody atmosphere created by director James Whale; Herman Rosse's memorable set designs, particularly the fantastic watchtower laboratory, featuring electrical equipment designed by Kenneth Strickfaden; the creature's trademark look from makeup artist Jack Pierce, who required Karloff to don pounds of makeup and heavy asphalt shoes to create the monster's unique lurching gait; and Karloff's nuanced performance as the tormented and bewildered creature. Frankenstein was greeted with screams, moans, and fainting spells upon its initial release, obliging Universal to add a disclaimer in which Edward Van Sloan advises the faint of heart to leave the theater immediately. If they don't: "Well...we've warned you." Director James Whale was memorably embodied by Ian McKellen in the Oscar-winning 1998 biopic Gods and Monsters. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

Flixster Users

81% liked it

37,779 ratings

Critics

100% liked it

40 critics

Unrated, 1 hr. 10 min.

Directed by: James Whale

Release Date: November 21, 1931

Keywords: horror, monster

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: August 28, 2001

Get It:

Stats: 1,555 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (1,555)


  • fb100000257973100
    May 13, 2012
    fb100000257973100
    I might as well say right now that if you are looking for a straight adaption of the Frankenstein story, you are in the wrong place. Being someone who has read the book outside of literature classes, this film never really follows the original tale at all. In fact, it actually im... read moreproves the tale. In the original novel, there was quite a few times in which the feel of Shelly being the immature writer (not having that must experience in writing) was very overpowering. But taking the script for a stage play adaption of the novel (just like with Dracula), what we get is probably one of the best telling of Man's attempt to be God.
    The story we all know by heart: screwed up doctor tries to play God by making man. But what a lot of people don't do is really look at the film for this film is not about Dr. Frankenstein (yeah people: the doctor is named Frankenstein. Not the monster. GET IT BLOODY RIGHT!), but about the symbolism of The Monster. One thing you tend to notice about the classic horror stories is the symbolism each of the monsters stand for. Dracula stood for depression (being alone for centuries). The Wolf Man for a woman's period (watch the film, and you will get why I even say that). The Creature Of The Black Lagoon for puberty (a hideous man trying to win the heart of a gorgeous woman). With Frankenstein, the symbolism is being unaccepted. Once The Monster is free from Frankenstein, it tries to be part of society and be accepted. But due to him literally having the brain of a mass murderer (damn you, Fritz!), he can't help himself and like most misunderstood people, he is hated by everyone. Even his maker. That is why James Whale's adaption strikes such a strong chord with people: it is all about a person that no one understands. No one gets. And Whale shows this perfectly in his flawless direction. He shows this while still providing the morality tale of Man trying to be God and the end results.
    There are only two people that need mentioning in this film in terms of acting: Boris Karloff and Dwight Frye. First off with Karloff. Like most people, they have to credit this film to him. He seriously sells this film with his timeless portrayal as The Monster. I honestly do not know how to do this review justice. This is one of those performances that just speaks for itself. Everything from the way he moves to his grunts. I am not going to review that performance. All I will say: it is legendary for a reason. I love Dwight Frye. I adore this man's ability to act. In Dracula, I liked how he played a sane man and then turned into an insane maniac while swapping back and forth. Here I love how he plays a mentally disturbed assistant that, in my observation, might have a deeper meaning. Okay, bare with me for a bit. It is known that James Whale was openly homosexual and in his films there are some undertones that suggest his sexuality. With Frankenstein, my believe is that Fritz became jealous of The Monster's relationship with Frankenstein and as such why he has such a strong hatred for the Monster. It is all about jealousy and the feeling that you are going to be replaced by someone you have grown to love. I believe that Frye used that to his advantage and helped to create this hunched back maniac. Brilliant.
    The rest of the actors (mainly Colin Clive and Edward Van Sloan) do their characters justice in bringing them all to life. But none of their performances actually stand out to me in this film. Hence why I won't go into detail about their acting.
    When I decided to review there classic horror films, I had to go and see if their horror still lives up. Like with Dracula (and I am guessing like with the rest), it does not. But as a drama and a tale of man's desire to be God, this film lives on for a reason. I have seen numerous adaptions of this tale, and while as an adaption this is terrible, as a film it works. Even 80 years after it's release. So, why only four and a half stars? Simple: While it did touch me in the way that I could relate to the monster, I would have liked it if they expanded on the characters a bit more.
  • January 3, 2012
    One of the most famous horror films ever filmed, Frankenstein starring Boris Karloff is a must see for every horror fan. Universal Studios brought horror to a mainstream audience with such titles as this. Frankenstein has got to be one of the most famous horror films in the histo... read morery of cinema, and with good reason. This 1931 horror classic secured Karloff's reputation and made him famous. Loosely based on Mary Shelly's book of the same name, this adaptation was changed quite a bit, but nonetheless is very exciting to watch. If you're a fan of old school horror films, then this 1931 version of Frankenstein is the one to watch. This is a must see monster flick, and after all the years, still manages to terrify and thrill the audience. Boris Karloff is a horror icon, and though his role in The Mummy cemented his reputation even further, his role as the monster in Frankenstein is his ultimate performance. Director James Whale crafts a solid film and every cast member delivers a strong performance. Of course I think the best performance of all belongs to Boris Karloff as he really brings a certain quality of innocence to the monster, which makes the viewer sympathetic towards him. Overall this is a fine horror classic that should be on the list of horror films to see by every horror fan. A flawless film, Frankenstein may differ from Mary Shelly's classic, but for what it is, this is a unique twist on a classic horror tale. I very much loved the film, and if you want to explore the genre than the regular horror flicks of today, and watch something different, and great, then this is a terrific monster flick to watch.
  • November 1, 2011
    James Whale's landmark 1931 release of Frankenstein is one of cinema's most engaging and thought provoking pieces of material. Not quite the horror film one might expect, it delves into the subject of xenophobia. Colin Clive's performance as the mad scientist is absolutely wonder... read moreful, as is Boris Karloff's career-defining portrayal as The Monster. I find this to be an annual film to watch every Halloween. It's such a wonderful film, regardless of the year it was made or how much it ages as time goes on. The story and themes themselves don't age.
  • fb1664868775
    October 27, 2011
    fb1664868775
    A horror classic. For me, honestly I think it's lost a little of it's magic over time but still has some shocking and beautiful moments. The scene where the monster meets the little girl is great. Also the image of her father carrying her dead body through town, with all the laug... read morehing people suddenly noticing her and looking in silence is one of my favorites.
  • November 27, 2010
    Truthfully I dont really know why people always overrate this movie over the Original Dracula wich was much better on so many levels. Yes some of the acting ine Dracula might have been over the top but you cant tell me the same is not true for this movie. Besides that prejudice I... read more hold this is a great classic horror movie so I love it. :)
  • November 15, 2010
    although the sequel is usually considered the better film, i prefer this original in most aspects. the acting and story are better and the images a bit more iconic, although the sequel produced many great images as well. the philosophy behind mans attempt to play God shines thr... read moreough in the film as much as the novel, and for a 1931 film the subject matter was challenging. one of the truest classic horror films in history.
  • September 3, 2010
    A classic movie with horror great Karloff.
  • April 1, 2010
    A satisfying and entertaining monster movie with a good moral message. It doesn't do justice to the novel, and it's influence is greater than the film itself, but still, it's worth a watch. I could go on and on writing about this film, but it's been praise enough, so very little ... read moreof what I could say would be original. All people who call themselves movie lovers need to see this.
  • March 2, 2010
    It's no Citizen Kane. But it's pretty impressive for being from 1931. Beats Nosferatu in every way......not even close man. Murnau....suck it!
  • November 17, 2009
    A classic that lives up to all of it's hype. Of the Universal Monsters, Frankenstein is the king. The tone and style is amazing, beautiful and haunting at the same time. The acting is perfect and allows you to enjoy the movie. The story was told so simply, yet powerful and meanin... read moregful. It feels like a horror/noir and definitely gave influence to the majority of later horror films and just film in general. It made horror a believable world.

Critic Reviews


October 7, 2008
TIME Magazine

[Whale] did it in the Grand Guignol manner, with as many queer sounds, dark corners, false faces and cellar stairs as could possibly be inserted. Full Review

Alfred Rushford Greason
September 24, 2007
Alfred Rushford Greason, Variety

Maximum of stimulating shock is there, but the thing is handled with subtle change of pace and shift of tempo that keeps attention absorbed to a high voltage climax. Full Review

Don Druker
June 5, 2007
Don Druker, Chicago Reader

One of the most deservedly famous and chilling horror films of all time. Full Review

Mordaunt Hall
May 20, 2003
Mordaunt Hall, New York Times

A stirring grand-guignol type of picture, one that aroused so much excitement at the Mayfair yesterday that many in the audience laughed to cover their true feelings. Full Review

James Berardinelli
January 1, 2000
James Berardinelli, ReelViews

As much as the later movies diluted the character of the Frankenstein creature, nothing could blunt the impact made by Karloff in the role of the most memorable movie monster of all time. Full Review

Teresa Talerico
January 1, 2011
Teresa Talerico, Common Sense Media

Classic monster movie still electrifies. Full Review

Dan Jardine
August 10, 2010
Dan Jardine, Slant Magazine

Frankenstein is a horror film that turns (miraculously) into an existential tale of man's fear of abandonment Full Review

Tim Brayton
October 13, 2009
Tim Brayton, Antagony & Ecstasy

If it isn't the best American horror film of the 1930s, that's only because the extremely gifted director James Whale wasn't done with the franchise quite yet. Full Review

Cole Abaius
February 11, 2009
Cole Abaius, Film School Rejects

The genius of all this beauty is that it truly is chillingly scary. Full Review

October 18, 2008
Boxoffice Magazine

From the standpoint of the story, cast, direction and photography the picture is sure to rate with the greatest in picturedom. Full Review

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Splice
    Splice (98%)
  • Edward Scissorhands
    Edward Scissorhands (62%)
  • Re-Animator
    Re-Animator (100%)
  • Gods and Monsters
    Gods and Monsters (64%)

Facts


    • Henry Frankenstein: Now I know what's it feels like to be god!
    • Henry Frankenstein: Crazy, am I? We'll see whether I'm crazy or not.
    • Henry Frankenstein: It's Alive. It's Alive!

Frankenstein : Watch Free on TV


Frankenstein Trivia


  • What was the name that the kid gave himself in the Sandler film Big Daddy?   Answer »
  • She played as a: 1. Troubled girl in Fight Club 2. Ape with a good conscience 3. Professor Frankensteinīs lover in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Who is she?  Answer »
  • In the movie Big Daddy, what does Julian change his name to?  Answer »
  • What great black and white classic has the following line? Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: Igor, would you give me a hand with the bags? Igor: [doing a Groucho Marx] Certainly, you take the blonde and I'll take the one in the turban.   Answer »

Movie Quizzes


Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin