Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Jeremy Davies, Élodie Bouchez, Gérard Depardieu, Giancarlo Giannini, Massimo Ghini ... see more see more... , Jason Schwartzman , Billy Zane , John Phillip Law , Silvio Muccino , Dean Stockwell , Angela Lindvall , Sofia Coppola

The feature debut of Roman Coppola (son of Oscar-winning director Francis Ford Coppola) centers around an international film crew making a low-budget, Barbarella-like feature in Paris in 1969. The fil... read more read more...m is called Dragonfly and is being directed by Andrzej (Gérard Depardieu), who wishes to make a revolutionary work rather than the tacky fluff it is becoming. He is soon fired by the film's Italian producer Enzo (Giancarlo Giannini) when he can't produce a satisfactory climactic scene. After briefly replacing Andrzej with an American horrormeister named Felix DeMarco (Jason Schwartzman), the film's editor and second-unit director, the job is finally handed to Paul (Jeremy Davies). Paul is pleased with the offer, but more devoted to his 16 mm filming of his diary of daily life. He eventually begins to fall for the leading lady (Angela Lindvall), but must retrieve footage of the feature stolen by Andrezej and try to keep the troubled production together. CQ features Billy Zane, Massimo Ghini, and Dean Stockwell in supporting roles. ~ Jason Clark, Rovi

Flixster Users

64% liked it

5,001 ratings

Critics

66% liked it

73 critics

R, 1 hr. 31 min.

Directed by: Roman Coppola

Release Date: May 24, 2002

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: September 10, 2002

Get It:

Stats: 223 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (223)


  • February 21, 2012
    "What is Real? What is Art? What is...the End?"

    A young filmmaker in 1960s Paris juggles directing a cheesy sci-fi debacle, directing his own personal art film, coping with his crumbling relationship with his girlfriend, and a new-found infatuation with the sci-fi film's ... read morestarlet.

    REVIEW

    Filmmaker Roman Coppola proves to be a chip off the old block (his dad is Francis Ford, duh!) with this sweetly dark comic valentine to foreign films of France and Italy focusing on a struggling film editor/auteur wannabe (Davies in all his squirmy, milquetoasty glory) assigned to a disastrous sci-fi B flick where he winds up being a replacement director and falls deeply in love with his gorgeous starlet (Lindvall, the epitome of sex echoing the leonine good looks of Catherine Deneuve at her start) in the process. Coppola has a keen technical sense incorporating set and production design, costumes, camerawork, editing and low-key acting to make a picture perfect ode to the hurly-burly world of filmmaking then and now. If there is a criticism it is that it is a bit slight in its theme (filmmaker's navel gazing fails to see the big picture: love is all around) yet there's a nice homage to Coppola's relationship with his famous father in the interplay between Davies and his onscreen father Stockwell, an absent-minded businessman, echoing nicely. The title is a play on Seek You = CQ.
  • January 6, 2009
    A visually stunnig (2002) film that takes place in Italy in 1969, whose plot revolves around the making of a Sci-Fi film meant to take place in the far-off and distant future of the year 2000.

    It is also a look at the inner workings of the film industry and the struggle of one... read more editor turned director, to create a career making film while not allowing his obsession with that films star (Dragonfly) ruin his relationship with his (Real Life) girlfriend who also happens to be the star of HIS own side project which is based on his personal life.

    While the story is a bit convoluted at times...there is enough here (especially visually) to keep fans of film interested (especially fans of Sci-Fi and/or Italian cinema).

    And (call me crazy) but I would REALLY like to see the finished Sci-Fi film: "Codename Dragonfly" (think Barbarella meets Austin Powers) in it's entirety. Perhaps as an 'extra' on the DVD?
  • December 29, 2007
    Would be interesting if anything actually happened.
  • October 31, 2006
    Visually great but lacking in story.
  • June 30, 2011
    Unlikable self-absorbed hipster rubbish about an unlikable, self-absorbed hipster "nice guy" zombie working on a schlocky Barbarella ripoff. He treats his perfectly nice girlfriend like shit until she leaves him, but its okay, she was like a total bitch anyway, and he gets to tra... read morede up to the superhot babe starring in the movie! Oh, and Jason Schwartzman is in it, which is simply throwing gasoline on an irritating hipster fire.
  • August 6, 2007
    Terrific little film (that's hardly been seen) about relationships and the Italian film industry of the 60s. Director Roman Coppola beautifully captures the era and his sequences featuring a sci-fi flick a la BARBARELLA are spot on. Some beautiful performances, a score that nai... read morels the film music of the period, and terrific production design make this a film to seek out.

    **There's a movie called DAVID HOLZMAN'S DIARY (1967) starring L.M. Kit Carson as Holzman. That film influenced the plot of CQ - particularly the young director filming his every day life - and Carson makes an appearance in CQ.
  • June 21, 2007
    great movie, i highly recommend it. i had a chance to meet roman coppola once but i was too busy being antisocial at a film festival to bother asking who i was trying to be introduced to....
  • April 20, 2007
    "CQ" Reviewed by Paul K. Bisson


    One of the taglines from Roman Coppola's "CQ" is "every picture tells a story." Indeed. Unfortunately, the writer/director (son of Francis) also believes that every story is worth telling. This is where "CQ" falls short. It's three movies al... read morel rolled into one. Well, sort of. Actually, it's really only one movie--about the making of two movies. Still with me?

    Its 1969 and the revolution that swept through French cinema is all but at an end in Paris. Most of the visionary and radical techniques developed during La Nouvelle Vague have been absorbed into mainstream movie-making. So much the better. Those who once critiqued film, invaded the movie-making process. Renouncing the steady gloss and glow of Hollywood counterparts, their trademarks included dominant hand-held camera motion, natural light instead of manufactured, follow-spot tracking and convention-breaking editing styles that presented stories which favored the inner human struggle over exterior conflicts. Long, uncut takes, open-ended endings and improvised dialogue from mostly unknown actors were not uncommon elements for these directors who sought out the appeal of a younger, more influencing audience.

    We meet filmmaker Andrzej (Gérard Depardieu), a veteran of this revolution hired by a main-stream producer to direct a main-stream "sci-spy" sexploitation film, "Dragonfly" (think "Barbarella"). Only he's not delivering on the goods. The bombastic producer (played with relish by Giancarlo Giannini) wants gloss, glitter and an explosive ending to top all endings. Andrzej would rather punch a hole through a wall than compromise his art. In fact, he does.

    Enter Paul, the young American film editor, a meek, bleak character that Jeremy Davies plays so well. Paul is lost. He's searching for personal truth. Truth in love, truth in art, truth in life. He edits "Dragonfly" by day but uses his free time to produce a personal documentary, filming himself, his girlfriend and his sourroundings--an exercise he hopes will reveal the truth in his life.

    But what happens when Andrzej is fired from "Dragonfly" and Paul is promoted? That's the strength of "CQ." Truth in art is put to the test as Paul finds himself in the director's seat. Truth in love is challenged when he falls for Dragonfly herself. Will he find his personal truth when all is said and done, or is personal truth something you make up as you go? What a wonderful theme to explore! Does Paul evolve from a boring, lifeless sap into a caring, feeling, hopeful individual? Here's a guy looking for the truth in his life yet he can't see the forest for the trees. Will he ever?

    Coppola doesn't care to answer. Instead, the film trips over its own potential. It uses all three films ("Dragonfly," Paul's documentary, and itself) to tell the story. One moment we're watching Paul film "Dragonfly," and then we're actually watching "Dragonfly." This is a gimmick that has worked brilliantly in such films as "Living in Oblivion" and "The Big Picture." But it fails here. Why? Because it doesn't serve the movie. And why should it? It plays rather nicely on its own. Coppola knows his story and characters are barely above the line of interest and could never survive a straight telling of the tale. They need the gimmick. It's a diversion. It diverts.

    What does that say about personal truth?
  • January 20, 2007
    This small odd film has some nice odd elements with him, an almost romantic imagination. There are cinematographic experiences tested being matched above with this film, much function, but overall, it does not maintain a quality full and coherent.
  • August 3, 2006
    A bit too surreal for even me. I just didn't get it and thought it was boring. However, I would see it again for a second chance.

Critic Reviews


Loren King
July 20, 2002
Loren King, Chicago Tribune

A film that is visually compelling and highly entertaining in an in-jokey sort of way. Full Review

Terry Lawson
July 12, 2002
Terry Lawson, Detroit Free Press

Coppola's observational and satirical skills are impressive. Full Review

Joe Baltake
July 10, 2002
Joe Baltake, Sacramento Bee

The cinema-awareness of CQ is such that it looks as if it was made by and for someone who has seen every movie imaginable but hasn't lived yet. Full Review

Peter Howell
June 14, 2002
Peter Howell, Toronto Star

It's not much of anything, apart from eye candy. Full Review

Rick Groen
June 14, 2002
Rick Groen, Globe and Mail

CQ has a modicum of IQ and a dash of style. Full Review

Desson Thomson
June 10, 2002
Desson Thomson, Washington Post

A charming, spirited movie for cinephiles, or those who aspire to be. Full Review

Jonathan Curiel
May 31, 2002
Jonathan Curiel, San Francisco Chronicle

The film deserves some kind of honor for its campy originality, smart and funny dialogue, and provocative yet sensitive look at the making of a film circa 1969. Full Review

Hank Stuever
May 31, 2002
Hank Stuever, Washington Post

A certain sexiness underlines even the dullest tangents.

Bruce Westbrook
May 31, 2002
Bruce Westbrook, Houston Chronicle

while [Roman Coppola] scores points for style, he staggers in terms of story. Full Review

Chris Fujiwara
May 31, 2002
Chris Fujiwara, Boston Globe

In other words, ''CQ'' triumphs over its own trendiness only by being vapid and superficial. Full Review

View more CQ reviews

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me
    Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me (14%)
  • Danger: Diabolik
    Danger: Diabolik (78%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

CQ : Watch Free on TV


CQ Trivia


  • What does Ellie call to [ as a child ] in Contact ?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for CQ. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?