Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Ashley Judd, Michael Shannon, Lynn Collins, Brian F. O'Byrne, Harry Connick Jr. ... see more see more... , Neil Bergeron , Bob Neill

Academy Award-winning Exorcist director William Friedkin scuttles deep into the darkest recesses of the traumatized human psyche with this tale of a lonely bartender haunted by the long-ago disappeara... read more read more...nce of her young son, and the paranoia that emerges when she enters into a tentative relationship with a deeply disturbed drifter. Adapted from the off-Broadway play by Tracy Letts, Bug centers on Agnes (Ashley Judd), who tends bar alongside pal R.C. (Lynn Collins), and has recently moved into a shoddy roadside motel in hopes of avoiding her menacing and recently paroled ex-husband, Jerry (Harry Connick Jr.). Upon making the acquaintance of subdued former soldier Peter (Michael Shannon, repeating his stage role), a veteran of the first Gulf War, Agnes finally senses that things are looking up. Quietly charming despite his melancholy aura, Peter soon reveals to Agnes that he contracted a "bug" while serving in the Middle East, and that it may have been deliberately administered as part of a secret military medical experiment. Convinced that the microscopic insects are quickly multiplying just under the surface of his skin and that they have now infected Agnes as well, Peter soon descends into a psychotic rage as he resorts to increasingly desperate measures to purge himself of the offending subdermal arthropods. ~ Jason Buchanan, Rovi

Flixster Users

32% liked it

353,895 ratings

Critics

61% liked it

131 critics

DVD Release Date: September 25, 2007

Stats: 14,348 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (14,348)


  • April 10, 2012
    Poor Michael Shannon! Imagine having to play the same role time and again and turning something as exciting as acting into a mundane routine. In William Friedkin's colossal misfire of a psychological thriller, Shannon portrays yet another nutcase (who goes by the name of Peter Ev... read moreans), this time a 'delusional paranoid schizophrenic'...but a bigger one compared to his recent "Take Shelter". But that isn't the least of our worries. He is also a violent crackpot, a total madcap who inflicts cuts and wounds on himself!

    What's more..he has great convincing power, whereby he is capable of making a complete fool out of a seemingly sane but depressed Agnes (Ashley Judd). Friedkin takes us audiences to be complete dimwits too, what with Agnes' lesbian friend R.C. who 'just met' Peter introduces him to Agnes and brings him to Agnes' motel room for a night of alcohol and cocaine binging! Now it is just one meeting but after some sob stories and a surprisingly quick bonding later, Agnes and Peter end up having sex! One unconvincing situation after the other and we get to the focal point.....the bug infestation! Peter suddenly starts finding bugs everywhere...on him, around him, and keeps slapping himself once in a while in an attempt to kill these bugs....Agnes can't see anything, but Peter, the great convincer that he is manages to convince Agnes that the room is infested with bugs.

    [img]https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-6U1EZkobjYM/T4Q2ppbJlGI/AAAAAAAACW0/O-kSmjLrKiU/s624/vlcsnap-2012-04-10-18h56m59s142.jpg[/img]

    And to add to it there's a bizarre conspiracy theory of the US army using Peter as a guinea pig to conduct some ghastly experiments which include planting bug egg-sacs in his tooth! By the time the senile old Friedkin starts bombarding all this nonsense on the audiences, we are already awaiting the end of the film, simply because we are just not interested in the madness anymore. And Shannon, being Shannon and a pro at acting like a psychotic weirdo, has a ball doing it, with extra gusto this time...convulsing, swatting invisible bugs all over his body, inflicting injuries, twitching his face, slapping it once in a while, hollering at the top of his voice concocting one theory after another as to what actually is happening with him and Agnes! Judd joins in, with an initially stellar performance which unfortunately takes a free fall in the second half of the film, in which both Judd and Shannon seem to be vying for the trophy of the most ridiculously over-the-top and unintentionally comic performance of all time! A nervous wreck that she becomes, she also mouths off loud lines in resonance with Shannon's insane ramblings about implanted computer chips and manufactured zombies, human guinea pigs and androids posing as humans ........you feel like reaching for the stop button already! At one point of time I literally felt like getting a bug spray and dousing Shannon and Judd in it to free them from their misery!

    [img]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-uI6lJu3J2V0/T4Q2wyYfjuI/AAAAAAAACXA/buOHplnwIPI/s624/vlcsnap-2012-04-10-18h55m25s224.jpg[/img]

    Add to that Friedkin's non-serious attitude thanks to which he throws so much of logic right out the window....I mean, it's a Motel room that's been turned into a tin foil house decorated with bug zappers! Where are the Motel authorities for Christ sakes?! Agnes is supposed to be great friends with R.C. but she trusts Peter over R.C. and slaps R.C. out of her room! A lot more incredibly brainless situations abound. Throw in some couple more stupid scenes and a subplot revolving around Agnes' estranged abusive ex-hubby Jerry (Harry Connick Jr) who acts like a tough guy wife-beater in one scene, yet foolishly gets his hand stapled in the other..... and voila! You got the perfect schlock in the name of a "disturbing psychological horror".

    But that's not all! Friedkin gets even more ambitious...and tries to do a Hitchcock here, and needless to say, fails miserably in creating any sort of locked-in, claustrophobic atmosphere, which just comes across as a cheap imitation. Shyamalan did a much better job in "Signs". There are but a few tense moments which are far between and can't do much to save the film as a whole. There's also Judd's fine acting until she turns into a hysterical comedian joining in the cacophony of Shannon's jitter-'bug' maniacal clown. Both of them devise a 'great' plan to save the world from the bug infection, one that's supposed to affect us deeply; but we find that we have almost given up by the third act.....


    Score: 3/10.

    [img]https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-VlzbmQjm6kA/T4Q4H-qCLCI/AAAAAAAACXQ/nvTvc6JsUok/s624/vlcsnap-2012-04-10-19h09m16s83.jpg[/img]
  • April 2, 2012
    [img]http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/user/icons/icon14.gif[/img]

    It's often quite hard to take Bug seriously because of the overly frantic performances and the highly laughable storyline but it's a film that's never without any interest. William Friedkin's direction is... read more as good as expected and Judd's performance is the most outstanding trait of it and elavates the film more than anything else. While not in any way groundbreaking it's an artsy, stylish and brave paranoia film that get's quite intense despite a ludicrous final act. It's not as engaging as Friedkin's The Exorcist but it's got it's moments.
  • October 22, 2011
    I think the misconception that people have with Bug is that they expected a straight forward horror film. Well, Bug is most certainly that, and more. After viewing it, I realized it had other genre elements such as drama, thriller and psychological mixed with body horror. At leas... read moret, that's what I thought of the film. The film is a good mix of drama and psychological horror. Director William Friedkin steadily builds up the tension and in doing so, adds human emotion between the two characters. Bug is fairly underrated and doesn't deserve the flack it has received. The film is quite different from other horror films, and the thing that people expected from this film was a straight forward horror film that jumped right into the action. But Friedkin took a different route by adding other elements to the film, and it works well enough to appeal to viewers looking for something different in a horror film. The acting is good here, and the chemistry between the two leads is wonderful, and works well. There are things that could be done better, but for what it is, Bug is a totally different horror film than what has come out in recent years, and it's a refreshing take by combining elements of drama and psychological thrillers. Bug is a good film, but if you're expecting a horrifying, straight forward horror flick, you'll be disappointed. This is a different style of horror film, and I enjoyed it a good, intricate story with good acting and good directing on behalf of William Friedkin makes this a good viewing for any horror fan. The film is disturbing and scary enough at times and it doesn't deserve the negativity it has received.
  • July 25, 2010
    An unhinged film based on an unhinged play, "Bug" is paranoia gone wild.

    "Bug" gives Michael Shannon and Ashley Judd lots of occasion to play crazy - and they rise to the occasion. Judd is a surprise, she may not have Award-winning chops, but she proves with "Bug" that she ... read morecan elevate her acting above popcorn-flick, tough-ish damsel-in-distress roles.

    But "Bug" belongs to William Friedkin who keeps a lot of the intimacy of the play to capture these two souls in their descent into madness. "Bug" doesn't entirely work, it's probably a bit too weird keeping audiences at arm's length - but Friedkin directs with abandon and delivers a film you probably won't ever see the likes of in a long while.
  • July 25, 2010
    This film did not have a good plot. the whole film was not really good.
  • January 20, 2010
    When a delusional escaped mental patient holes up with a slow and extremely lonely white trash waitress, good things will not follow. Well-acted, if a bit wearying, adaptation of a stage play that traps the viewer deep in a claustrophobic web of paranoia and conspiracy theories
  • November 18, 2009
    Completely original and out of its mind. The story/characters are so convincing that it makes the movie 10x better than it theoretically should have been. The dialogue was realistic and emotional, staying away from corny sappy monologues. The look of it was also really well thoug... read moreht out and effective. It is an addictive experience throughout, you can't wait to see and understand what is the root of the character's dilemma.
  • July 9, 2009
    This is one of the few "horror films" that is actually an "actors film".

    By that I mean the characters (there are really only four with any major screen time) are well developed, with the two leads getting the opportunity to REALLY show some range. And it is the two leads (Ju... read moredd & Shannon) that really make this film work as well as it does. Which (for me) was good, solid, but not GREAT.

    The film succeeds in creating a creepy, claustrophobic, manic environment. However there are moments when the environment (and the acting) seems like "too much" and starts to feel a bit over done...almost cartoonish.

    There are a few "gore scenes" that felt sort of tagged on to make it more sellable as a "horror" film. But I feel like the story is intense enough that these scenes ended up cheapening it more then enhancing it.

    Michael Shannon (as with Revolutionary Road) "knocks it out of the park". Few people can pull off "obsessive compulsive nut job" like Shannon. Judd is impressive as well, but not as consistently as Shannon.

    All in all it is a pretty solid psychological thriller.
  • February 24, 2009
    To be honest, I don't really know what to say about this film. It is creepy more for its seedy underbelly of a woman caught living on society's fringe (which Friedkin does an excellent job of depicting), than it is for it's final horrific half hour, which, while making me squirm... read more (pulling your own tooth out with a pair of pliers was truly an impact moment), didn't have the emotional impact of what had gone on before.

    To me, the story is more about a lonely loner type woman who seems somehow a step out of sorts with those around her. She plays kissy face with a fellow barmaid (obviously a dyke), does coke with her and her aquaintance, yet doesn't want to accompany her to a party. She is obviously bi, and yet the hints are there that it's more a statement about lonliness and trying to connect than any commitment to any kind of sexuality, other than her innate need to be dominated. Her lonliness is amplified and the signals are subtle; she seems tethered to an abusive relationship with a con who say he loves her, but it's obvious that he only loves that he can control her. You begin to wonder about her, if all the phone calls at the beginning of the film, where there is no-one there when she answers, are legit.

    When the story comes out about her child's dissapearance you begin to see the cracks in her facade and that her little tough girl routine is, as the song cleverly plays in the backround, just a masquerade.

    This makes the absurdity that follows at least somewhat plausable, and it is a revelation that she is just as unhinged in her own way as the lunatic who believes that his body is infested with government planted bugs.

    There are times when it is obvious that this screenplay was developed out of a play, but for the most part it remains just quirky enough to hold your interest; at least until the final payoff, which is a major letdown which, I suppose, is where madness eventually leads to, but it still comes off as a contrived bit of theatre.
  • September 6, 2008
    "Paranoia is contagious"

Critic Reviews


Richard Roeper
May 29, 2007
Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper

Beat by beat, Bug is gripping: It has that feverish compression of great theater, but director William Friedkin gets inside it, so it's never stagy.

Colin Covert
May 25, 2007
Colin Covert, Minneapolis Star Tribune

A film of excruciating intensity, a psychodrama that infects the imagination.

Dana Stevens
May 25, 2007
Dana Stevens, Slate

This is a movie about the dangers of letting love rob you of your reason and cut you off from the world, and, bugs in the bloodstream or not, who hasn't been there? Full Review

Desson Thomson
May 25, 2007
Desson Thomson, Washington Post

Ashley Judd and Michael Shannon (who reprises his stage persona) never allow us to categorize the main characters as one-dimensional nut jobs but two emotionally fractured souls who retreat into paran... Full Review

Claudia Puig
May 25, 2007
Claudia Puig, USA Today

Bug won't get under your skin as much as it will assault you with its ghastly claustrophobic drama and over-the-top performances. Full Review

Susan Walker
May 25, 2007
Susan Walker, Toronto Star

The cheesy soundtrack and the lacklustre acting undermine [director Friedkin's] efforts at turning an intelligent play into a scary movie. Full Review

Mick LaSalle
May 25, 2007
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle

Bug goes exactly where it needs to go -- to a place most filmmakers don't dare go -- and gets there brilliantly. Full Review

Tirdad Derakhshani
May 25, 2007
Tirdad Derakhshani, Philadelphia Inquirer

After nearly three decades of misfires, major and minor, William Friedkin, the creator of The French Connection, The Exorcist and Sorcerer, is back in true form with Bug. Full Review

Lisa Rose
May 25, 2007
Lisa Rose, Newark Star-Ledger

Bug is a twisted, visceral film with an uncompromising sense of nihilism. Full Review

Kyle Smith
May 25, 2007
Kyle Smith, New York Post

Bug buzzes around in random menace for an hour until its third act, when -- zzzzzt! -- it flies straight into the zapper. Full Review

View more Bug reviews

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Jacob's Ladder
    Jacob's Ladder (67%)
  • The Fly
    The Fly (67%)
  • L'Enfer
    L'Enfer (0%)
  • Vacancy
    Vacancy (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Bug : Watch Free on TV


Bug Trivia


  • what type of bug was flick in the film bugs life?  Answer »
  • What number is on Herbie in the love bug?  Answer »
  • In the Disney film "The Love Bug", what's the name of the VW?  Answer »
  • Famous dialogue from the film Terms of Endearment: Garrett Breedlove (Jack Nicholson): ...You got me into this so you're going to have to trust me on this one; we're going to need ALOT of drinks... Aurora (Shirley MacLaine): To break the ice? What is Jack's memorable response?   Answer »

Movie Quizzes


Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin