Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Charles Chaplin, Dawn Addams, Oliver Johnston, Maxine Audley, Harry Green ... see more see more... , Phil Brown , Michael Chaplin , John McLaren , Shani Wallis , Joy Nichols , John Richard Ingram , Jerry Desmonde , Robert Arden , Robert Cawdron , Alan Gifford , Joan Ingram , Sidney James , Lauri Lupino Lane , MacDonald Parke , George Woodbridge , Clifford Buckton , Frazer Hines

King Shadov (Charles Chaplin), the newly deposed monarch of a small European country, arrives in New York to face a life in exile. No sooner does he get here, however, than he discovers that his prime... read more read more... minister has stolen the entire royal treasury and departed for parts unknown. Stranded in New York in a luxury hotel without any money, the king tries to adjust to life in America and elicit interest in his plan for the peaceful use of nuclear power. He finds America in 1957 to be too noisy for his taste, however -- a run-in with some rock & roll dancers leads to some slapstick antics, and he doesn't take much to modern movies or the blaring entertainment that goes with them. He meets a pretty young lady (Dawn Addams) in a slightly risqué slapstick encounter in which he is trying to "rescue" her, and she maneuvers him into helping to plug a deodorant on television. The king proves so beguiling on the small screen that he is deluged by offers from advertising agencies, which he rejects at first. But the king soon finds that advertising may be the only thing he can do to earn enough money to keep him living like a king in exile, and he tries to work the system to his advantage, his earnings from television enabling him to remain in the country and push his peaceful nuclear plan. He soon finds the true dark side of life in the United States, however, when he crosses paths with an unhappy little boy (Michael Chaplin, the star/director's own son) whose parents are about to be jailed as part of the anti-Communist hysteria of the period. In the end, the king provides a shelter to the boy but compromises himself in the process, and while he does make the Congressional committee investigating him look foolish, he sees that he has done all of the good that he can do for now in the United States and leaves. ~ Bruce Eder, Rovi

Flixster Users

72% liked it

1,861 ratings

Critics

80% liked it

10 critics

G, 1 hr. 45 min.

Directed by: Charles Chaplin

Release Date: January 1, 1957

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: March 2, 2004

Stats: 91 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (91)


  • fb1142797643
    August 13, 2011
    fb1142797643
    Charlie Chaplin's last starring role was a perfect vehicle, drawing on both his intercontinental charm and his nagging troubles with United States immigration. Far from a success, the film wasn't even distributed in the States until 1967.

    Chaplin (now white-haired but impressive... read morely spry) plays King Shahdov, the deposed monarch of a fictional European country. He flees to New York and takes up residence in a posh hotel, but finds himself broke after his prime minister betrays him and steals the royal treasury. A beautiful lass (Dawn Addams) cons the needy king into entering the advertising world, with amusing results. He becomes an inept pitchman and media celebrity, dodging fans and reporters just like today's royals. Later, Shahdov befriends a precocious boy (Chaplin's real-life son Michael) whose parents who are suspected of being Communists.

    Chaplin's elegant wit and grace are delightful, but the film is frustratingly uneven. The advertising satire is quite funny -- particularly a scene about a fraudulent dinner party -- but the anti-McCarthy material turns indulgent and heavy-handed. And a few plot threads are left dangling. Will the prime minister be brought to justice? What about those vaguely mentioned "atomic" plans that will revolutionize the planet? And did Shahdov's wife need to enter the story at all?

    Scenes end too abruptly. Chaplin's score seems corny and outdated. And his acting philosophy remains stuck in the silent age, calling for exaggerated body language from himself and others. A particularly bad example is how the younger Chaplin ridiculously wags a finger during his political rants. Another is the restaurant vignette that just serves as an excuse for Charlie to pantomime "caviar" and "turtle soup." Still, the shot where he joyfully dances and vaults into a tub can't be missed. (But what bizarre sort of hotel puts a door between adjoining bathrooms?)
  • October 13, 2011
    Easily the worst of Chaplin's starring vehicles. Although there are a few moments of witty social commentary, done mostly through visuals and criticizing the advertising culture of America in addition to HUAC, the story is aimless and the movie is severely lacking in entertainmen... read moret value. First off, anyone hoping for Chaplin doing a funny accent, you will be disappointed, no effort at an accent is made whatsoever. As far as zany physical gags go, they are rare and very tame. Romance? Not really. The film is neither chaste nor romantic, but in a bland middle ground. Timeless? Actually, extremely dated. As for an extremely touching ending like you would find in other Chaplin pictures, well, no, the movie just ends without much of a resolution either way. A King in New York may be a metaphor for the shredding of Chaplin's career by the HUAC. Throughout the movie, there are extremely trite and uncreative sequences, and if these were intended to be so, maybe there is some sort of commentary on how the American socio-political-entertainment system destroys creativity. Also, there is a smart kid in the film whose talents are snuffed, but the kid is such a terrible actor that the whole concept is undercut. I could not find a relevant message with any cogency. Instead, A King in New York is an unfunny comedy and an uneven and unorganized social critique. Let me show you how this corrupt societal class creates shitty art by showing you some shitty art is not a sufficient way of presenting said argument. While Chaplin may have been going for something in the vein of Limelight but instead something very bleak where Limelight was uplifting, he completely failed in doing so. This is the one Chaplin movie I would recommend skipping.
  • October 29, 2008
    With this film, Chaplin tends to hammer the viewer pretty heavily with anti-McCarthyism rhetoric, but since it was the infamous "red scare" that forced him into permanent exile from the United States five years earlier, I feel inclined to cut him some slack for the heavy-handed, ... read morepreachy political statement that tends to subtract from this overall enjoyable comedy.

Critic Reviews


Dennis Schwartz
April 16, 2007
Dennis Schwartz, Ozus' World Movie Reviews

The coming of talkie films has been unkind to the legendary silent film comic, Charlie Chaplin. Full Review

Mark Bourne
April 14, 2006
Mark Bourne, DVDJournal.com

Taking a fire hose to HUAC is an impulse worth applauding, but the overall movie is so tone-deaf and tired that the method sinks the message. Full Review

Ken Hanke
May 26, 2004
Ken Hanke, Mountain Xpress (Asheville, NC)

Though constrained by budget and the unfamiliar methods of British studios, the film is nonetheless Chaplin's last great gift to the world. Full Review

Jeffrey M. Anderson
March 29, 2004
Jeffrey M. Anderson, Combustible Celluloid

A King in New York proved prophetic, not only in the McCarthy witch-hunts, but also in the relentless advertising and television obsession we have today. Full Review

March 26, 2009
Variety

Click to read the article Full Review

Nora Sayre
May 9, 2005
Nora Sayre, New York Times

Click to read the article Full Review

Roger Ebert
October 23, 2004
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

Click to read the article Full Review

Dave Kehr
January 1, 2000
Dave Kehr, Chicago Reader

Click to read the article Full Review

Cole Smithey
June 29, 2007
Cole Smithey, ColeSmithey.com

No review available.

Emanuel Levy
June 30, 2005
Emanuel Levy, EmanuelLevy.Com

No review available.

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • The Great Dictator
    The Great Dictator (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

A King in New Yor... : Watch Free on TV


A King in New York Trivia


  • What type of animal terrorised New York In the movie King Kong???  Answer »
  • Legendary Movie Scene: Fay Wray and Robert Armstrong play in this 1933 film , which has had many repeats. A giant ape strides atop the Empire State Building in New York City, swatting at airplanes which attack him. Name the movie.  Answer »
  • Stephen King Was such a fan of the film 28 Days Later..., He bought out an entire showing of the film in New York City.   Answer »
  • What movie is this quote from? When you kill a king, you don't stab him in the dark. You kill him where the entire court can watch him die.   Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for A King in New York. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Recent Lists


Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?