Horroooooor

Great beginning for a great series.
I didn't see a few of them, but sooo want.
Same for the remake, next year.

Good sequel

Good sequel

Not bad!

But really not 1 of the best Friday the 13th movies.
We don't understand, really know, if it's Jason Voorhees who kills or not.
The characters are annoying, so, we don't wanna them to survive.

I still didn't see all of the Friday the 13th (although I am Jason Voorhees; but we don't watch what we live; do we? ;) ), but almost all, and this one was the worst; uncounting Freddy vs Jason who disappointed me a lot; contrary to the excellent Aliens vs Predator. But AvP 2 is really less good.

It's a pretty good film anyways, cause of the immortal serial killer we love, and so many ingredients of the series, but they anyways fall a bit asleep on their laurels writing this script.

I've been disappointed by the fact they changed Crystal Lake to Forest Green, but it's clearly understandable as it's to try to clean the name of the city of its awful story, reputation.
And they anyways very often call it Crystal lake all along the movie.

But we get what we want, a lot of deaths (18 on this one in only 90 minutes, wow) by so many different ways, so, a lot of suspense, and shot in beautiful places in forests, so, it's clearly not a movie to miss; at least if, like me, you like to see an entire series, although not all movies can be great.
Otherways, if you aren't a great fan of Jason, there are dozens of better horror movies than this one.

Great idea to try sci-fi with that series.
Great result!

Really impatient!
Hope it'll be as well as the Halloween or Hills HH remakes.

Very good a bit scary movie.

Finally not as well as Halloween & THHE remakes. But this isn't at all a remake, but just 1 more good sequel. The story have nothing to see with the 1st, between else when the killer isn't the same person.

Some very childish dialogues, jokes, considering the ages of the cast; so, not really funny sometimes, but more heavy.

1 very good point was so many beautiful breasts. I really didn't think to see those, so, it was a very good surprise. Lol
Sad anyways not to let some of these sex bombs alive, for I could date them.

Otherways, a lot of good ideas of deaths, pretty girls, some cool dudes (Aaron Yoo rules), some cool quotes (although what I said above), and some very nice places in the forrest for example, make it be a great horror.

A revolution in horror history!
Greaaat ideas of traps.

Like all the Saw, soooo good; maybe except the 4th, a bit under

Same than the 2 firsts

Under the 1st trilogy, but anyway, we still all want to see the V, VI, VII (already planned)... Til what? Saw XXX, in 2033?
:D
Greaaaat!

The IVth Saw was a bit disappointing. With this one, we're back to the very good series.
I loved when the couple realize they could've survived the 5.

In the family of Saw, in want the lil bro.
A bit under, but sooo good anyway.

Maybe a bit under the 1st
Anyway, impatient for the 3d

Wooow!
The shock!
A masterpiece of the genre.
In the family of Texas chainsaw in a way.

Watcha!

I waited with a great impatience to see it, cause I really loved the 1st one.
So, in the same time, I was afraid to be disappointed, even if I knew it couldn't be totally the case.
So, bought it a few weeks ago, and finally watched it this early morning, and... waw.
So shoking and gore by moment, just what I expected, just like the 1st movie; apart that there's more death, and that's only for our pleasure.
Could've been longer, cause nowadays, 85 minutes is really short for a movie.
I hope they'll find a great idea of script for a way longer sequel, but I bet a sequel will not be longer, and as this 1 is a bit worse than the 1st 1, I'm afraid again for the next 1.

As often in that kind of movies (more specially for the sequels of horror), the cast is totally unknown (or almost), and there are some totally stupid and unlogic things, like the fact they so often break the group. Apart for the story to be more freaking, it has any logic explanation.
For example, when 4 of them are already dead, why the hell a guy leave the 4 others to go alone???
O_O
Yeah, he's afraid of going into the mines, and that's understandable, but there isn't anyways for a man go by himself in those conditions.
Otherways, it's totally mindless that they leave so easily their weapons behind them. For example, why the fuck do they leave the room of the mine where they killed Papa Hades, leting their M16 with the baïonette, and also the spear he used, and the axe, the mass... behind them, when they still are into the dark mines, they are hurted, desperate, afraid and they don't know how many monsters are still there???
O_O
Do someone have a good explanation about it?

Finally, the dialogues supposed to be funny aren't several times.
Very pee-poo humor, so many times heard and not anymore funny... or it could be if it was better written.

The monsters are so ugly, and disgusting that only this is a bit scary.

Anyways, it stays a good horror that I'll watch again and again with pleasure.

Wooow!
Respect!

Finally seen a few months ago.

The best of the original trilogy for me

Worst of all Romero's zombies flicks

Just, great!
Ving Rhames, excellent,as usual.
This version is really, but really different of the original 1. It's not really a remake of the George Romero's Dawn of the Dead.
The common points r mainly:
- Some people who didn't know each other before the zombie's pb meet in this desperate situation, and find together a refuge.
- The mall
- The survivors finally escape from the mall.
- The black cop as hero.

Almost everything else is different between these movies.

I own and love both movies, but prefer a bit this 1, even if there r also things making me prefer the old 1.

Not far of a masterpiece also.
Sadly, cast pbs!
Asia Argento save it.

Ouch!

Really under Land and Dawn (both versions) of the Dead, for me.
But anyways a bit better than Night of the Living Dead and Day of the Dead.

A good thing is that I like movies made with a FPS mode of shooting, and that's cool that they start to be common.
Cloverfield, Doom (for the long amazing sequence shot like the games of the series), The Blair Witch Project, who's often named as a pioneer, a precursor of this style.
But there have been some others before; I thought to 1-2 another day, but I forgot them now.
Too bad...!

Contrary to Land of the Dead, - but as for the previous ones -, a entire cast of unknown actors and actresses.
Anyways, that doesn't impede some movies to be great, as all stars were totally unknown people when they began, logically. Almost all in fact, cause not all the childs of stars.
But in this case, if they aren't bad actors, they aren't excellent neither I think.
There are anyways some stars, as I discovered watching the bonuses.
Wes Craven, Stephen King, Quentin Tarantino, Guillermo Del Toro and Simon Pegg, who all voiced newsreaders.
A nice idea!

Otherways, the script isn't bad at all, just not as well as the ones I said above.
But there are anyways some very good scenes.
Interesting also to see some events on the security cams.

To conclude, I'm anyways, as usula with Romero, very excited, impatient to see Survival of the Dead, his 6th zombies' film in the series.

Funny, very good ideas like the records throws fight or the meeting of the "clones" group, but I expected more, after having heard so many good things about it.

I've read things making me be impatient to see that parody of the genre, like Shaun was
I hope it a bit better

Under Romero's works
Not the best VG adaptation at all.
In the genre, the RE r way better.

Some very good scenes, but not at all an excellent movie.

A lot of pretty girls, but the masculine's cast is way under, way less interesting.
Sid Haig and Masi Oka (even if I didn't see, recognize him when I watched the film for the 2d time, a few days ago, and I didn't know him the 1st time I saw this movie; but I must admitt that, as it's not a so great movie, I used internet during watching, so, I didn't follow totally, didn't see everything) anyways clearly save it, but they have only small roles.

Good adaptation of the games (the greatest fan of the universe tell u that. I have 12 games and 8 books, and the DVDs), even if I expected more.
I hope they will use more creatures for the next ones.

Good to have introduced Nemesis

Best of the trilogy!
Some great scenes like the crows in the desert and the battle against clones.
I own the 12 Resident Evil games, and read 4 of the 9 books written til now, and so, I really regrett that they said they'll not make a new movie; even if they'll probably change their mind 1 day, it could be in a lot of years, and it's sad, when so many kind of creatures of the games hasn't been used in the 1st trilogy.

Very good, but I've been a bit disappointed.

I like the 3 movies, love the games, like some novels of RE that I read...
So, as a great fan of the Resident Evil's franchise, maybe I expected too much of this animation, and so, could only be disappointed...

The kinematics in the games are so beautiful sometimes that I expected an animation of Resident Evil since years, and here it is.
Good!
Specially about the graphics, who are very well done; but sadly the style is a bit different of the games' kinematics I think.
But anyways, the problem of this film, for me, was more the script.
It's not bad, not at all, but not enough worked, thinked, in my opinion.

Anyways, I don't regret to have bought it, cause it's a good entertainement.
So, I still hope a sequel to it; like one to the non-animation movies.

A great movie who've had too much bad sequels or remake.

The beautiful Renée Zelwegger doesn't save the film.

Disapointed!
Even with the beautiful Jessica Biel

Really better than the previous one!

But still under the original one.
Anyways, really better also than the 3 sequels made in the 80''s & 90's.

Great idea!
New kind of "bad guy"

The 4th, the 4th, the 4th

The worst movie in the series!

This film isn't bad, but it's really worse than the 3rd one, who was excellent, and it's also worse than the 1st and 2d movies of this licence.

I was disappointed seeing the movie lasts only 80 minutes, but considering it's really less interesting than the previous ones, it's not that bad, finally.

The death ways are less originals, interesting than in the other films.
Between some deaths, it goes too fast, not leting us breathe, and making the movie be just a pretext to link some deaths, and not a complete story.
Some deaths are really unrealistic, making us not believe in them, and not being involved into the movie.
And also the effects aren't great, so, another reason for we can't believe in it.

The actors also aren't great, spoiling it a bit more.

Also the fact that, - for the 1st time in the series -, the hero can see the next person's death, disappointed me.

The good point was to see it in 3D; but it could've contained really more impressive things in 3D.
But it was nice to see my 1st movie not animated (I saw Monsters Vs Aliens and Ice Age 3 last months) in 3D; apart Honey I shrunk the kids and a movie with Michael Jackson that I saw in 3D in Disneyland, years ago, but those were short movies.
I'm impatient to see the remake of My Bloody Valentine in 3D. Normally next week!

A bit under what expected
But a group of girls; coool!
:)

Good sequel!

But not as good as the 1st movie in my opinion.
Apart the 2 girls from the 1st film (and the new girl too) the cast is really average for me.
They aren't at all charismatic and don't act very well I think.

Interesting anyways too use some elements of the previous movie, like the corpses.

Great idea of script

A very good concept!
The 1st is really excellent.
The 2d a bit less, but still good.
So, I really wanna see the 3rd.

Lol, some times ago, I put "I wanna see it", cause I forgot I already did.
I rent it 2-3 years ago, cause I loved the 1st and liked the 2d too, but a bit less.
It's not a good sign when you forgot you saw a movie.
It proves the film didn't touch you a lot.

Anyways, I saw it again on TV a few days ago, and yes, it's definitely way worse than the first movies.
It didn't come on theatre but is a Direct To Video flick. This explains that. Even if some TV or DTV films are great.
Of course, the budget isn't the same... even if some series or TV movies have budgets way more important than some cinema's ones.

The pb with this one is that it doesn't really respect the concept of the series, so...
Sure they use some urban legends, but way less than the last movies, and not as entertaining, interesting ones.
I dislike the Candyman movies, so, to use the same legend (as they even admitt in the movie, saying that the Candyman myth inspired the Bloody Mary legend) just a bit transformed, as the main legend of this 2d sequel isn't a good choice in my opinion.

But I liked some scenes, like the spiders walking under a girl's skin and going out to kill her.
Or also the final scene in the cemetary contains some interesting ideas, and the snow make it be a nice place.

To conclude, as you understood (and can see, checking the average ratings for the 3 movies), even if you loved the 2 firsts, no need to watch it. And if you wanna see an Urban Legend movie, avoid this one.
Watch the 1st, you shouldn't be disappointed.

A very good not enough known Scream like.
Scream 3 is inspired by it, seting the action during a film shooting.

I expected more
Really a Texas' like

Ouch!
Gory f***ing great!

Finally seen!
10 times better than House of 1000 Corpses and more or less as well as Zombie's Halloween.

Rob use amazing actors who all are so freaking, even in tuxedo and without any horrible make-up.
All have "faces" as we say. Meaning faces who hypnotise you, that you can't forget, faces of people with experience, talent, and looks.
I for example really like Ken Foree (since Dawn of the Dead, Romero's version, so, in 1978) and Danny Trejo.
Sheri Moon is sexy, the kind of girl you give god without confession (like the expression says, even if I'm not a believer). So, that makes her be kinda more scary than Bill Moseley, Danny, Ken or Sid Haig and William Forsythe.

This movie is some kind of mix between:
The Hitcher, Joy Ride, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Hills Have Eyes, Gacy, Jeepers Creepers and some others.
Its more or less as good as Texas and Hills, and better than all the others.
So, a damned good mix it is!

I must admitt that I love the ending, between else.
I couldn't support that they all survive, even if that would mean a sequel with them, and that'd be excellent of course.
But when the sherif is killed and they are all saved, I was disgusted.
Maybe he deserved to die too, as he becomes almost as crazy dangerous as them. But it was a cold blood revenge for him, so, it's far away to be as monstruous as all this monsters' family did.

Very classical to make us almost have pity for those barbarian rapers and murderers and to give the cop the bad role.
But I have to confess that I was laughing in some moments when he tortures them; which I never did when they did it to their poor victims.
This movie make think that the cop is right. The only way to stop these people is to become like them, to hunt them and not just chase, and it's almost impossible to imagine to quietly arrest them and let them live in jail till they escape and start again.
When you act without any humanity, like they do, you know what's waiting you, what you'll get, and you must assume to be shot like a deer by hunters.
In life, you get what you give. Or at least, it should be more often the case.
But badness is so more powerful that it wins, most of the time.

Anyways, near a masterpiece is this film.

A grrreaaat movie
With the child, it's just... waaw!
Strange to have seen him in a small caïd role in Hancock

Soooo under the 1st Halloween of Mr Zombie!

I was really disappointed to see another kid than the excellent Daeg Faerch to play young Michael Myers.
If, for a reason or another, Daeg couldn't do the movie, they shouldn't have put scenes involving him; considering how the scenes are, I confirm there shouldn't have been those moments in the movie to make it be better.

I also found annoying and uninteresting to put Myer's' mother's ghost.
I mean, WTF??
It spoils the entire movie, more as she appears often.
Why?
Why to make this?
Just to give a role to Mrs Zombie? It seems, as it doesn't have any interest. If they wanted a role for her in this movie, they just should've not make her suicide in the 1st film, and that's it, instead of giving us boredom making her turn back as a ghost; and a ghost pushing her psychopath of a son to kill, like she was herself a murderer when alive.
Tsss, bullshits!

I think that without those things, it would've been a good movie; anyways, still really worse than the 1st one.

Good, but I expected more

I've heard good things about.
Even if the 1st wasn't that good, I want to see it.

Great surprise!
Creation of a new genre of horror.
Great director, Craven!
Great scriptwriter, Kevin Williamson!

A very good sequel!
A lot of supporting roles of it became stars now.
So many stars started their carreers in horror movies. So, so much of them died in their firsts movies.
A phoenix have to die to ressusiscate,
;)
The idea of the mother make think to the very 1st Friday the 13th.

Good end to the trilogy
A 4th, when? When u want guys

A good Scream like
And not strange, when u know it's the same scriptwriter, the genious Kevin Williamson.

Nice place to shoot

Sadly, nobody of the original cast.
A sequel just for money, but not bad.

What a deception, coming from Wes Craven

A greaaaat surprise!
So strange movie!

Robert "Freddy" Englund, playing another kind of monster

Only own and saw the 4th one.
Pretty good, making me wanna discover the others.

I'd like to see Leonardo in an horror.

The only 1 I saw
I like sci-fi horror, but it's far away of the Alien series

A baby Johnny Depp could be the only reason to see it, (but I'm not sure I haven't in fact) cause I own the 3rd one, and it's pretty disappointing.
Out of all these cult series of the 70's - 80's (Friday, Texas, Child's Play, Halloween...), this 1 is the worst. No, in fact, Amityville if the worst. And I'm talking only of these cult series, cause, otherways, in horror, there are some worst movies.
I anyways wanna see the soon coming remake of it.

Some sexy scenes
Nice tongue!
Lol

Too many movies for this series.
Maybe the most disappointing in Wes's great carreer.

Disappointing!

I really liked Bride of Chucky, (Child's Play 2 and 3 also if I remember well), and wanna see Seed of Chucky.
I thought I saw this 1 too, but as I watched it a few days ago, - after having bought it -, I finally think I didn't.
Anyways, the sure thing is that I expected a very better movie.

I thought to see more murders, more deaths.

I remember I saw all and liked all, but it was so many years ago, that I can't imagine any seen, being sure if it's from the 1st, 2d, or 3rd.

Excellent!
Nice Jennifer Tilly

Wow!
Halloween, Friday the 13th, Texas chainsaw, Elm street, Child's play...
R there some classic of this period who aren't planned to be remade soon???

Great start, for a great series
Just sad that, seeing it again, I can see the man in the alien suit.

Deception!
I was impatient cause of the 1st, and the trailer, but... a bit disapointing.

Yeeeaaah!
Schwarzyyyyy!Governatoooor!
Beautiful jungle, a lot of action, great fights...

Gimme the jungle baaaack!

A very good mov'
Gizmo is so cuuuuute

Good sequel
A bit under the original

A good script!

Good to see Leelee and Steve Zahn who should be more used in block busters (even if Leelee was in Deep Impact).
They deserve more honors, celebrity...

It makes me think a bit to Spielberg's masterpiece (and 1 of his very 1st works), Duel.

I want to see its sequel.

I expected more, when I heard so many times of it, before to see it in theatre, when they put it back, some years ago.
But it's way better than all sequels or prequel. Way way way better!
And the main theme, is one of my fav musics ever, even if I sadly can't have it in mind right now.

Disappointing!
Not freaking!
More boring!

The 1st wasn't good, so...

Very disappointing for me.

I can't believe that the excellent Wes Craven chose Alexandre Aja to shoot the remake of The Hills Have Eyes after having seen this.
But anyways, his remake of THHE is great.

1 of the most violent movies I ever saw. Physically and psychologically.
The french version of Saw, or Hostel, but worse.
The people playing the supporting roles aren't good actors.

I love the cover!
Less the movie, but it's not a bad movie.

The original, - japanese- version was way better
The american sequel is really better too

The 1st japanese was good.
The 1st american wasn't.
But the american sequel was way better. It stays anyway an average movie.

Very good remake by the director of the original 1.
I'd like to see the japanese version, and the sequels.
Scary by moments, which is rare for me.

Even if the japanese movie wasn't very good.

A good horror thriller!

Some kind of mix between Titanic, Poseidon, Alien, Virus (1999) and Abyss. Definitely a good mix!
A not bad cast (mostly thanks to the nice and talented Famke Janssen) doesn't waste anything; it's the opposite of course.
The creature, the monster is gorgeous, splendid!

Boobs, gore, boobs, trash, boobs, asses and even some pussies.

What else could we want?
Maybe a better script, although it's not that bad.
Otherwise, nice places, cute girls, and a luxury and lustful casting.

Pretty cool movie!

I saw it only a few weeks ago.
1st was better!
By moments, it seems more like a kind of remake, than a sequel.
Anyway, it wasn't bad.

I thought it was better, when I heard about.
Anyway, not bad, and Bridget Fonda is a good reason to see it.
;)

1 of the worst horror movies I saw; even maybe THE worst.
Annoying, not at all freaking!
How can this movie be so famous?
Very overrated!

Very better than the 1979 movie.
Very very better!
Like for Halloween or The Omen, but in this case, the original was crapy; not Halloween, neither The Omen.

Very original!
But not at all the most freakin' mov' ever, like we so often heard n' read about it.
Cloverfield and Rec (+ it's remake, Quarantine) all used the way to shot popularized (but not created) by TBWP.

A very good adaptation of Bram's book, with an interesting casting.
When I 1st saw it on theatre, I left just a bit before the end, cause I was afraid; but I was only 9-10.

A great surprise!
But the sequel and prequel r really worst.

The worst of the series!
Far of the level of the 1st.

Very good cast (Brad, Kirsten, Slater, Banderas, Cruise), but 1 of the worst vampires movies I saw.
And I just LOVE the genre.

I liked the original with Rutger Hauer, n' so, really want to see the remake.

Good script!
Sadly, something's missing...

I want to see it again!
7 years since!
Good to see an adaptation of Jack The Ripper's life.

Not good thriller, even if it's the excellent Christian Bale who's the hero.

A crapy movie!
Even if I didn't see it, I'm sure the original one is better.

1 of the rare Hitchcock I saw.
A good movie!
The last of Alfred if I'm right.

I'm a bit arachnophob, so, I love all movies and games with giant spiders beeing destroyed.

The remake is way better.

I thought there were only 3 movies in the original series. So, I saw the 3, and found them more or less good; but the remake was better for me.

An good remake, of a not excellent movie.

Disapointing, for a serial killer's movies lover like me.

Not better than the 1st.

The 2 first were way too bad for I wanna see it.

Interesting adaptation!

I love the only Alone in the Dark game I own, on PS 1.
It's a very good survival horror game, in a genre where apart it and the Resident Evil series, we really are missing options.
I anyways also bought Alone in the Dark 5, the last one, but didn't already start it, even if I'm impatient to play it siince 1 & 1/2 year, when I 1st heard of it.

SO, about the movie, the underrated Christian Slater is a very good choice.
Tara Reid and Stephen Dorff are interesting too.

Some very impressive and well directed and with great effects scenes, like the one with the bullet in slow motion through the ice cube to the bad guy.
And of course the scenes with the creatures; especially the massive attack from the woods. So many monsters and militaries; and guess who win? I'll not tell you.
;)

So, the creatures are cool, but as for Resident Evil movies (even it's really better with those), it misses some different creatures from the games.

I'm impatient to see the sequel, to discover what kind of monster they added, but sadly, i'm sure it'll never come to theatres. Anyway, DVD...

It could've been better. U could imagine interesting things to do if u were invisible.
The transformation is well done anyway.

The 1st was average, so, no need to see a sequel.

A very good monsters movie.
It's cool to see Dracula, the monster of Frankenstein, the Werewolf and even Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde in the same movie, all hunted by Van Helsing.
The lanscapes r beautiful, and the castle of Dracula is great too.

An excellent thriller/horror with awful sharks.

Apart Samuel L. Jackson (who sadly die too fast in the movie), the casting is pretty disapointing in my opinion.

The sharks are very impressive, dangerous, and so, make very good monsters, enemies for the characters.

The end is pretty surprising, considering who die and who doesn't.

I've been a bit disappointed, considering all I heard about, and the excellent next movie of Eli Roth, Hostel.
The story's good, it's trash and a bit freaking by moments, the sets r pretty, but, it misses something to be very good. I dunno exactly what...

Sadly, I didn't watch it very well, cause I was falling sleep
:(

Like the Carpenter's movie, average.

Interesting casting (Welling, Maggie Grace and Selma Blair), but the script isn't very interesting.
The idea of the haunted fog is pretty good, sadly, not well used.

I'd like to see the original one, but this 1 is great.
And the game on PS2 is amazingly freakin' and good.

I own the video since somethin' like 7-8 years, but never watched it. Is it normal doc?
Lol

Not at all bad S. King's adapt.
I didn't really like the book. The film neither is great, but, it has somethin'.
I really wanna see Carrie 2, anyway.

A good thriller/horror.
The huge alien creature is excellent. It's a surprise that we didn't expect.
The cast is good too.

I expected really more

Really disappointed by the 1st one, I anyway think I wanna see the sequel; but for free, so, on TV or not.

Very good horror, although the presence of Crapy Hilton & Chad Dumb Murray.

I largely prefer The Chronicles of Riddick; but it's not bad anways...

The 2d is soooo crapy, that I don't want to see the 1st.

I heard a lot about it, bought the videotape, and shit... it's probably the crapiest horror movie I've ever seen.

Very good surprise is that slasher.

A pretty good serial killer story!

A not enough known serial killer movie of the 80's, who could've made a series like a lot others of this period; Friday the 13th, Halloween, Elm Street, Child's Play, Texas Chainsaw...
But thanks to the remake, it'll be discovered by some fans of the remake wanting to watch the old one.
I'm personnally pretty excited to see the remake, specially in 3D. Hope it'll come to me.

The character has everything to be the serial killer of a series of slashers.
A sad bad past, a great mask (gaz mask), good weapons...
And like in Scream for example, he's friend with his victims.

Otherways, the mines are a good set for the action; even very good.
And the city and the rooms out of the mine are excellent too.
Very good choice for a thriller, cause those places can easily be scary.

The good thing is that I totally forgot who was the killer between the 2 times I watched my DVD, so, nothing was spoilt.

Good but not excellent!

2d horror movie I see in 3D (after Final Destination 4), 2d a bit disappointing.
I hope the next ones will be better.

I think that the original My Bloody Valentine was a bit better. It's very different anyways.

This remake misses (like FD 4 did) some more uses of the 3D effects. I hoped to see some things coming to me, out of the screen. It happens a bit at some moments, but not enough times and not enough effectively.
So, you can watch this movie in 2D without any problem, and maybe more watch the 1981's version of this story.

Yoooohooo!
Very good adaptation of a VG.
I'd like to see a sequel!
The 1st person vision sequence is a great moment!
Rosamund Pike is soooo pretty!

Not at all the best story of the master, Stephen King.

Another overrated movie, for who I don't understand the huge love.
But not toooo bad.
Anyway, poor Stephen King, who agrees with me, when it's the worst of the 90 adaptations of his books, according to him.
And the best is also the best for me, The Green Mile. So, Mr. King and I have the same tastes about the movies made from his stories.
Proud of it!
Lol

1 of the best vampires flick ever.
And the sequels r great too.

A great film!
I love the Blade movies.
He's an excellent character, fighting and killing vampires.

Very good 3d part of a great series.
I just love Blade, the half-vampire, half-human. It's an excellent character.
Excellent also to have introduced the beautiful Jessica Biel in it.
Sad that a 4th with Wesley Snipes isn't planned.

Yuuuck!
How can so many people love it? That made me buy the DVD. Shit!

Fun, weird, ugly, well done and directed.

Really disappointing

A pretty good thriller, horror movie.
From a true story if I'm right.

Not scary enough and too long.

A pretty good thriller!
I like the house and the swamp near it.

Very good thriller.
The actors r very good; maybe specially Michael Pitt.

An interesting story by the master, Stephen King.

I expected really more!
After all, I AM Jason Voorhees!

[Rec] was good, so, I'm interessed by its remake.